According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising.
The following argument states the results from the recent report of the marketing department of the Super Screen Movie, during the past year, and they have known that fewer people attended the movies than in any other year. However, the percentage of positive reviews by movie viewers has increased within the same time period. The conclusion drawn mentions to implement a rise in share of its budget so that it can advertise and let people know about the availability of good quality movies. This conclusion might seem to be appropriate at first, however, there are many critical points ignored that are needed to be addressed to show how fatal the notion is.
The most important missing point is that the reason for the decreasing number of people in audiance is not clear. There might be a scenario that when this theater was newly built, the quality of seats might have been good and hence more and more people came to watch movies there, however, there might have been a case where since last one year, it has gone too old without any renovation and with the old seats which are no more comfortable to sit. Hence, this eliminates the need to think that there is a problem with the advertising. Not only the quality of seats, but there can be other serious issues regarding the cleanliness too.
There could have been a decrease in the quality the of speakers used or the sanitation of the canteen might have been really bad where people get their snacks at the interval. The possibility of litter all around the theater makes it very unhygienic and thus even though the theater provided good quality movies, people did not come to watch it.
In addition to the cleanliness issue, the theater might also be lacking the qualities and features to be competent enough to the provisions of the theaters that came up or became popular within the last year in its surrounding. There can be the case that there are the same movies and sows or even better movies in the other theaters and the audience might get split up according to their choices and preferences and hence the good reviews are from only those minority who actually likes the movies. This can also be the reason of decreased viewers.
With a possibility of a recent opening of lockdown can also be a reason of decreased audience. There can also be a picture that the same movies are available on online platforms and thus people are not willing to spend more money to go to the theater. In addition to that the people might not prefer the theater since it has increased it price
Thus considering all the counterpoints to the stated argument, it is very pristine that the conclusion to necessitate the increase in budget to advertize is not clever enough, instead of other factors like cleanliness, upgradations and renovations are taken into consideration, might prove to be more useful to attract more viewers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-25 | rubelmonir | 16 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | rubelmonir | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | Mizanur_Rahman | 50 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | tedyang777 | 60 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | barath002 | 58 | view |
- According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actu 58
- Claim Group assignments that students must work together to complete should replace a substantial amount of traditional lecture based instruction in college and university courses Reason It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers 66
- A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms Of the advertising 68
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country 54
- Some people believe it is often necessary even desirable for political leaders to withhold information from the public Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed 83
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 9 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 500 350
No. of Characters: 2338 1500
No. of Different Words: 226 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.729 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.676 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.449 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 153 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 104 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.412 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.361 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.882 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.323 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.592 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.077 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... implement a rise in share of its budget so that it can advertise and let people ...
^^
Line 7, column 455, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this minority' or 'those minorities'?
Suggestion: this minority; those minorities
...nd hence the good reviews are from only those minority who actually likes the movies. This can...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 339, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'prices'?
Suggestion: prices
...r the theater since it has increased it price Thus considering all the counterpoin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, however, really, regarding, so, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.6327345309 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.9520958084 131% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 55.5748502994 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2391.0 2260.96107784 106% => OK
No of words: 500.0 441.139720559 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.782 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.56307096286 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50188648823 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 204.123752495 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 756.0 705.55239521 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.8473053892 136% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.4473423364 57.8364921388 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.4375 119.503703932 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.25 23.324526521 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.70786347227 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211329237087 0.218282227539 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753167054877 0.0743258471296 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126693113999 0.0701772020484 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111379756522 0.128457276422 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122894625694 0.0628817314937 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.3799401198 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.197005988 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 98.500998004 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.1389221557 129% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.