This material lacks some information that would help to make the mentioned explanation sound. Three questions should be assessed: does global worming affect the area, described in the passage, what time of the year are the reports made at and what is the real cause of the decline?
The first question arises due to the fact that global warming can leave some areas without any aberration from normal temperature. In this case, if the area is considered to be an untouched one from the prospective of weather changes, the living conditions of Arctic deer of the area will not be changed. On the other hand, if there is no such evidence, the explanation in the passage will be strengthened, meaning that the animals were truly affected by the change of weather conditions.
The second question concerns the reports, particularly the time of the year when they were made. If the reports were made at the time, when the migration of the animals caused the area to be empty, the conclusion about animal population decline will lie on biased grounds. Therefore an answer to this question will give the opportunity to assess the cause-effect relationship through a transparent frame without any ambiguity.
The third important question that should be answered is the one related to the real cause of the decline of the population of deer. The coincidence of the weather changes with the cut of the number of the animals does not necessarily mean that there are not any other circumstances affecting the decline. An answer to this question will allow understand if the weather conditions were the only factor to cause the decline.
As it can be seen, more information is needed to understand the real answer to the question; however it might come true that the real answer is the one, given in the passage.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same t 61
- You have received a gift of money. The money is enough to buy either a piece of jewelry you like or tickets to a concert you want to attend. Which would you buy? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 60
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend.Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom w 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ion decline will lie on biased grounds. Therefore an answer to this question will give th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 11.1786427146 9% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 55.5748502994 74% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 2260.96107784 66% => OK
No of words: 307.0 441.139720559 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88273615635 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6934033856 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 204.123752495 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495114006515 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 705.55239521 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4995726468 57.8364921388 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.916666667 119.503703932 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 23.324526521 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 5.70786347227 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0691422477183 0.218282227539 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291606437466 0.0743258471296 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370654527879 0.0701772020484 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0387424181666 0.128457276422 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338629840753 0.0628817314937 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 98.500998004 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.