argument
While it might seem logical at a single glance that the author's argument to allocate greater amount of money for the success of their movies, however, the argument is flawed. We thus, need a significant amount of evidences to bolster the author's argument.
To begin, the argument is totally based on the sweeping assumptions that genearlise the conclusion. Here,the author introduced the vague and ambiguous words like "fewer", "percentage". The author seems to offer some statictical facts however, the author fails to provide the exact number of the movie viewers as well as what percentage of positive reviews have been received from what number of movie viewers. If from a town has the population 1 million people and hundred people have reviewed the movie past year. It makes no sence even there will be 100% percentage increase ie total of 200 people give positive reviews on the Super Screen movies to state that comapny is having no quality problem on its contents.
Secondly, the author assumed that advertisements have not been reached to the actual mass of movie viewers making unaware of the movies released so that they are facing reduced movie viewers.The author asserted the strong conclusion based on thye weak and implausible evidence. There might be the reasons people were bored with the super Screen Production Company's movies. Similarly, there may another reason that people were interested on other production companies' movies which actually matched their type and contents what they wanted to see.
Thus, above points needs to be adressed properly to strengthen the arument. however, as stated earlier, the author's argument is flawed.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 16
- The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. 68
- All college and university students would benefit from spending at least one semester studying in a foreign country.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 50
- cfhg 16
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...eem logical at a single glance that the authors argument to allocate greater amount of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...cant amount of evidences to bolster the authors argument. To begin, the argument i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ons that genearlise the conclusion. Here,the author introduced the vague and ambiguo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...has the population 1 million people and hundred people have reviewed the movie past yea...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 192, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...t they are facing reduced movie viewers.The author asserted the strong conclusion b...
^^^
Line 13, column 77, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...sed properly to strengthen the arument. however, as stated earlier, the authors argumen...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 109, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...rument. however, as stated earlier, the authors argument is flawed.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 55.5748502994 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 2260.96107784 63% => OK
No of words: 267.0 441.139720559 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34082397004 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83968743236 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 204.123752495 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59925093633 0.468620217663 128% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 705.55239521 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1292400447 57.8364921388 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.833333333 119.503703932 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 23.324526521 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.70786347227 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168519440542 0.218282227539 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937389536964 0.0743258471296 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133721115491 0.0701772020484 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151837028523 0.128457276422 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139487606422 0.0628817314937 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.3799401198 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.5979740519 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32208582834 111% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 98.500998004 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.