Argument:
Owning to the risk and cost, human travel to space must be terminated instead must be used what are known as unmanned aircrafts.
The author, unevidenced in to why not the men be sent to space, did partially backup the argument, where putting forward the claim of not deploying the manned crafts. The assumptions fundamentally on which the author argues have only the safety risks and cost expenditures, which are marginally far outweighed otherwise by the apt advantages of research and discovery in case of manned aircrafts.
The manned aircrafts’ machineries, receptors and processors when deployed can be considerably and lucidly exhibit more breakthrough novel information as part of the argument is that they would be instantly controlled and examined by men, in case some fault occurs. And partly their skills set marvelously collaborated with those of unmanned aircraft’s tools in the unmanned aircrafts could possibly produce dramatically different space research results, part of which is that they would rectify instantly and the most effectively an error occurring in machines functionalities. They could conceivably best self-experience the space conditions and casually when landing on the planets casually, their novel surface textural features and so on, which while improvingly modify their research, personally opening to them a new realm never seen before.
The argument is flawed as: the cost did play a cardinal role in any field research, especially heavily a key one in the fields opened newly to human vision. However, this cost can be duly compensated by the investors’ interests and financial benefits in marketing those to the potential audiences and sister enthusiast buyer and potential investor, in the novel usefulness and the diversity of manned collected information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-16 | muhammadhanzlamunir | 40 | view |
- Argument Owning to the risk and cost human travel to space must be terminated instead must be used what are known as unmanned aircrafts 40
- CLAIM The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones INSTRUCTIONS Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- CLAIM Men and Women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks INSTRUCTIONS Writing a response to which extent we agree or disagree while addressing the most compelling reasons and examples that can be used challe 50
- Claim 16
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the wellbeing of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as muc 66
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 15
No. of Words: 256 350
No. of Characters: 1390 1500
No. of Different Words: 156 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.43 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.004 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 103 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 83 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 70 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 36.571 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.368 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.286 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.441 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.681 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.109 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...scovery in case of manned aircrafts. The manned aircrafts’ machineries, receptor...
^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...craft’s tools in the unmanned aircrafts could possibly produce dramatically different space re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 28.8173652695 42% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 55.5748502994 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 2260.96107784 63% => OK
No of words: 256.0 441.139720559 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58203125 5.12650576532 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.56307096286 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11970009561 2.78398813304 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640625 0.468620217663 137% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 705.55239521 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 19.7664670659 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.8473053892 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9965985323 57.8364921388 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 204.142857143 119.503703932 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.5714285714 23.324526521 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.70786347227 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187686547751 0.218282227539 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805275534051 0.0743258471296 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360796762782 0.0701772020484 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116794017139 0.128457276422 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00747378558596 0.0628817314937 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.1 14.3799401198 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.48 48.3550499002 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.1628742515 181% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 12.197005988 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.68 12.5979740519 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.32208582834 130% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 12.3882235529 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.1389221557 147% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.9071856287 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.