The cynosure of the statement is to improvise the road infrastructure of Prunty county to reduce the road accidents. There are some analysis, like previously failed implementations and example of Butler County, provide in the statement to support improvisations. At first glace, the statement seems appropriate and convincing, but on in-depth analysis we can find various assumptions made that to weaken the statement.
The first statement states that Prunty County lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour but the many drivers were observed to not abide by the rules thus leading to accidents. Here, we need to have data on whether the members or drivers involved were well-informed of the speed limit or not. For example, there could be a probability that there we no road signs of speed limit or they were not changed from initial 55 limit. Thus, lack of awareness could have led to such circumstances. Also, there is no record of the other reasons of accidents. There might be multiple intersections in the infrastructure where accidents were observed and they are in dire need of traffic lights. If our reasoning made is apt, then instead of widening the roads, the need would be of traffic lights. Hence, in this case we do need information on the interconnections of roads and the signs which warn the drivers of the rules.
Moreover, we will also need the information on road improvements done in Butler county and their direct impacts on the accidents. We could spot the lightt on the fact that the areas where improvement were done, were not the areas where accidents were frequent before changes were done. Also, the areas even after improvisation might have the same rate of accidents. Some other policies on other regions of butler county would have likely observed reduction in accidents thus impacting the overall rate of butler county. This would imply that even after upgrades in road in the county, the reduction in accidents was not directly proportional ot it. It would suffice the need of Prunty County to resurface or widen the roads.
Another important statistic required is on the population of Prunty County which is not stated in the statement. On considering the fact that all the resurfacing and widening of roads are done, there might not be enough traffic for Prunty county which would also lead to increase in speed of the drivers( that was stated as the primary reason for accidents). The need for road resurfacing the butler county could have been the increase in population due to increase in educational or working opportunities, which might not be the same case for Prunty county. Thus the improvisation might lead to a reverse in reason of implementation in this case.
On concluding the assumptions and the data, it is necessary for us to understand that before enhacing the roads we have prerequisites to study on: the current road infrastructure(Intersections, signals and signs); region based data of Butler county(accidents observed on improvised sections); and population observations( of both the countys). This would enable to either weaker or bolster the statement and conform to it.
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership 66
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge 66
- In an attempt to improve highway safety Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways But this effort has failed the number of accidents has not decreased and based on reports by the highway patro 68
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most comp 54
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 520 350
No. of Characters: 2565 1500
No. of Different Words: 211 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.775 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.933 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.967 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 166 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 121 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 87 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 64 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.609 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.403 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.522 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.315 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.315 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.181 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 429, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'limit' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'limits'.
Suggestion: limits
...r they were not changed from initial 55 limit. Thus, lack of awareness could have led...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 557, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...not be the same case for Prunty county. Thus the improvisation might lead to a rever...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.6327345309 127% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.9520958084 185% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 55.5748502994 140% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2618.0 2260.96107784 116% => OK
No of words: 520.0 441.139720559 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03461538462 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.56307096286 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03435701347 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 204.123752495 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.421153846154 0.468620217663 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 819.0 705.55239521 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2868615209 57.8364921388 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.826086957 119.503703932 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6086956522 23.324526521 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13043478261 5.70786347227 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153066181234 0.218282227539 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509310157841 0.0743258471296 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566665926853 0.0701772020484 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836785641308 0.128457276422 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399024814898 0.0628817314937 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.3799401198 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 98.500998004 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.