The author starts the argument by mentioning that clay pots having a peculiar design have been found in the surrounding area of the prehistoric village of Karia. He makes a vague assumption that these claypots have been made exclusively by the people of Karia. The author fails to mention the fact that the clay pots might have been made by people living in villages which are neighbors of Karia.
Further, the author mentions that Karian clay pots found in Toga might not be necessarily Karian. From the statement given by the author, we can infer that Toga might be a neighbouring village to Karia. So, it is possible that clay pots found near Karia might have been made by the people of Toga.
The so called 'Karian' clay pot discovered by archaeologists might not be necessarily Karian. That clay pot might have been made by artists influenced by Karian design. It is also possible that these artists might have crossed the river. Therefore, the discovered clay pot should not be called Karian.
The author has deliberately reached an optimistic conclusion by considering a vague assumption. In the above argument, it is not mentioned that the clay pots found in Toga were similar to the ones found near the village of Karia. It is clearly mentioned that the Mist river is very deep and wide. Hence, it can be considered that not only Karians but people from some other village might have crossed the river and so, no Karian boats were found.
The author makes an assumption that Karians made their boats of a single design only. He fails to consider the fact that the Karians might have made boats consisting of a variety of designs to cross the river. Hence, it is not correct to mention that boats found on the banks of Mist river are not Karian boats.
The author has simply tried to reach an optimistic conclusion by improper and false assumptions. His conclusion is completely based on the assumption that the clay pots found near Karia have been made by the Karians themselves. It is also possible that Karian clay pots may not be uniquely Karian but this should not be the only conlusion to be infered from author's argument.
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2002 20 and future projections for 2025 73
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 73
- Some people believe that conservation efforts to protect the environment at the cost of human progress are unnecessary Others believe that society must preserve the environment regardless of costs or efforts Write a response in which you discuss which vie 50
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country 50
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 373 350
No. of Characters: 1730 1500
No. of Different Words: 131 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.395 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.638 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.417 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 102 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 69 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.65 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.516 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.35 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.393 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.622 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.152 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d clay pot should not be called Karian. The author has deliberately reached an o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, may, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 2260.96107784 79% => OK
No of words: 373.0 441.139720559 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76407506702 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46516166697 2.78398813304 89% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 204.123752495 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.369973190349 0.468620217663 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 542.7 705.55239521 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 4.96107784431 242% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3786891875 57.8364921388 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.85 119.503703932 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.65 23.324526521 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.70786347227 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.67664670659 214% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448793697956 0.218282227539 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176571742826 0.0743258471296 238% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132318920665 0.0701772020484 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277875460685 0.128457276422 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113377290754 0.0628817314937 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.3799401198 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.3550499002 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.5979740519 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.32208582834 87% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 98.500998004 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.