The authors of the argument claims that, based on s survey conducted among the jargon of local residents, to implement pool based recreation activities in the mason river in order to, reduce the pollution in that river and to use that river for a suitable purpose.
Although the claims seems to be plausible, close scrutiny reveals a logical untenablity.
Firstly, the survey is conducted only among the few residents in that locality to implement water sports in that mason river, there are not much evidence for the adaptability of the mason river for the water-based recreational activities, a broad objective survey, would lead us to more impeccable consequences .and also the suitability of the activities in the river should be analyzed to implement the plan.
Secondly, many complaints have registered regarding the cleanliness of the river, recently people experienced obnoxious small from the river, water sports does ensure the cleanliness of the river, so possible measures should be taken from the government to clean the river and to maintain it.
Thirdly, the acceptance of the water sports among the local residents, water sports do not suitable for all the age group, the safety, suitability, weather conditions and training facets are questionable, without analyzing all these facets, investing a large amount of budget is not a promising idea to yield effective outcomes from the project.
To conclude, the authors claim is incomplete to strengthen, the authors should provide the aforementioned information additionally, without further evidence the assertion includes logical flaws.
- Essay topic: In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department 33
- The following appeared in a letter to the school board in the town of Centerville."All students should be required to take the driver's education course at Centerville High School. In the past two years, several accidents in and around Centerville have in 50
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. 33
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. Write a response in chich you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the 16
- “Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places” 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'scrutiny'.
Suggestion: scrutiny
...hough the claims seems to be plausible, close scrutiny reveals a logical untenablity. Firstly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot much evidence for the adaptability of the mason river for the water-based recr...
^^
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...creational activities, a broad objective survey, would lead us to more impeccable...
^^
Line 4, column 313, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... lead us to more impeccable consequences .and also the suitability of the activiti...
^^
Line 8, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...amount of budget is not a promising idea to yield effective outcomes from the pro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 28.8173652695 28% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 55.5748502994 65% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 2260.96107784 61% => OK
No of words: 249.0 441.139720559 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53012048193 5.12650576532 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96469334375 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 204.123752495 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55421686747 0.468620217663 118% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 705.55239521 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 19.7664670659 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.8473053892 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.061546959 57.8364921388 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 229.5 119.503703932 192% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.5 23.324526521 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 5.70786347227 219% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212773287589 0.218282227539 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958464450212 0.0743258471296 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855511884114 0.0701772020484 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958464450212 0.128457276422 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855511884114 0.0628817314937 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.4 14.3799401198 177% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.4 48.3550499002 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.1628742515 181% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 12.197005988 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.68 12.5979740519 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.32208582834 124% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 12.3882235529 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 11.1389221557 165% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.9071856287 160% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.