The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha

Essay topics:

The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.

“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with children living in the group of islands that includes Tertia show that these children spend much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. This research of mine proves that Dr. Field's conclusion about Tertian village culture is invalid and thus that the observation-centered approach to studying cultures is invalid as well. The interview-centered method that my team of graduate students is currently using in Tertia will establish a much more accurate understanding of child-rearing traditions there and in other island cultures.”

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

In the article the author ,Dr. Karp, states that the observation based approach of
studying cultures is invalid and the interview based approach is will establish much
more accurate understanding of child-bearing traditions in island cultures.
Dr. Karp comes to this conclusion based on the fact that in the recent interviews
conducted by him with children living in the group islands that include Tertia ,
children spend much more time talking bout thier biological parents than about
other adults in the village. However, the author makes the following three assumptions

First of all, the author assumes that the culture of tertia has not changed in the 20 years
since Dr. Field visited tertia. Perhaps the people of tertia have started to engage more in
rearing their own children and less in children of others.If this scenario has merit,
the argument will render invalid.

Secondly, the author assumes that the questions asked in the interview were pertinent to the
aspects of life of the children which the other adults took care of instead of the parents
.Maybe the child's education was looked after by the other adults while the physical and mental
health by the parents.If the above is true , the argument will hold no water

Third, the author assumes that the number of children interviewed was enough to generalize
for every child in tertia. There is a possibility that many of the children interviewed
were particularly attached to their parents in comparison to the majority of the children in
tertia.If the above scenario turns out to be true, the argument will be significantly weakened

In conclusion, the author's argument as it stands is heavily flawed due to its reliance on
several unwarranted assumptions. If the author is able to prove that these assumptions
are warranted through a systematic research study then maybe the argument can be
right

Votes
Average: 6.5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-01 Sophy@ 66 view
2023-09-01 Sophy@ 58 view
2023-08-23 dhruv7315 77 view
2023-08-19 Mayuresh08 64 view
2023-08-18 Dinesh4518 85 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user rewat :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
In the article the author ,Dr. Karp, states that the observation ba...
^^
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that the observation based approach of studying cultures is invalid and the int...
^^^
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ew based approach is will establish much more accurate understanding of child-bea...
^^^
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the fact that in the recent interviews conducted by him with children living in...
^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...in the group islands that include Tertia , children spend much more time talking ...
^^
Line 6, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bout thier biological parents than about other adults in the village. However, th...
^^^
Line 11, column 59, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...children and less in children of others.If this scenario has merit, the argument ...
^^
Line 14, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d in the interview were pertinent to the aspects of life of the children which th...
^^^^
Line 15, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ults took care of instead of the parents .Maybe the childs education was looked a...
^^^
Line 15, column 93, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ts took care of instead of the parents .Maybe the childs education was looked af...
^^
Line 16, column 2, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Maybe
... took care of instead of the parents .Maybe the childs education was looked after b...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 23, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...sical and mental health by the parents.If the above is true , the argument will h...
^^
Line 17, column 43, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...alth by the parents.If the above is true , the argument will hold no water Thir...
^^
Line 19, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ren interviewed was enough to generalize for every child in tertia. There is a po...
^^^
Line 20, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d in tertia. There is a possibility that many of the children interviewed were ...
^^
Line 20, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y that many of the children interviewed were particularly attached to their pare...
^^^
Line 21, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rison to the majority of the children in tertia.If the above scenario turns out t...
^^^
Line 22, column 8, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...he majority of the children in tertia.If the above scenario turns out to be true...
^^
Line 24, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ficantly weakened In conclusion, the authors argument as it stands is heavily flawed...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 34, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ce on several unwarranted assumptions. If the author is able to prove that these ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, while, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 11.1786427146 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 2260.96107784 71% => OK
No of words: 306.0 441.139720559 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26797385621 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66602532064 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 204.123752495 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.468620217663 119% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 705.55239521 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 19.7664670659 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 22.8473053892 188% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.375302353 57.8364921388 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 230.285714286 119.503703932 193% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.7142857143 23.324526521 187% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2857142857 5.70786347227 250% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 22.0 5.15768463074 427% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 20.0 5.25449101796 381% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1649584851 0.218282227539 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084760829943 0.0743258471296 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537570611653 0.0701772020484 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0481427369402 0.128457276422 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054101761872 0.0628817314937 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.2 14.3799401198 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 48.3550499002 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 12.197005988 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.5979740519 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.32208582834 117% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 98.500998004 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 12.3882235529 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 11.1389221557 172% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.9071856287 168% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 309 350
No. of Characters: 1537 1500
No. of Different Words: 162 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.193 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.974 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.599 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 115 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 85 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 58 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.9 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.083 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.414 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.721 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.117 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5