The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues.
"Over the past year, the Crust Copper Company (CCC) has purchased over 10,000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia. Mining copper on this land will inevitably result in pollution and, since West Fredonia is the home of several endangered animal species, in environmental disaster. But such disasters can be prevented if consumers simply refuse to purchase products that are made with CCC's copper unless the company abandons its mining plans."
The extent to which consumer should purchase products that are made with ccc's copper has been complicated in its implication. According to the letter to the editor of a journal on environment">environmental issues, the author recommends that consumers should refuse to buy products from ccc' copper to avoid natural disasters. To buttress his argument, the author cites that mining copper on land will result in pollution and cause threat to endangered animal species. while declining to use products made with ccc's copper might be beneficial to protecting environment in some extent, the causal effect is not unambiguous due to unaddressed assumptions.
To begin with, the author unfairly assumes that mining copper on land would lead to natural disasters. if all equipment is environment">environmental friendly and pollutions can be eliminated by advanced technologies installed by ccc, then the negative impact to environment might be ignored. In addition, the assumption that this company will threaten endangered animal species. it is true that west fredonia is home of several endangered animal species, but do most of them habit on the land purchased by ccc? it is likely that west fredonia is very large, and ccc only owns tiny portion of land, so that these endangered animal species might still have agreeable habitats and sufficient resources to live and survive. it is also plausible that those endangered animals are very adaptive, and so mining copper has no influence on them. Unless the author provides direct causes to environment from ccc, the assumption about disaster is not convincing.
Moreover, the author assumes that it is relatively easy and feasible for consumers to refuse to purchase products made with ccc' copper. this claim might make sense if people can readily find other replacement to substitute ccc's copper. On the contrary, if ccc is the only company who provide copper, then doing so might strongly affect people's normal livings. if all those products are necessary goods to citizens, not to purchase them may be not a wise decision. Additionally, if the company abandons its mining plans, ccc might think out other ways to process their copper, which could cause even worse influence on the earth and lands. Without assuming that ccc's copper can be easily substituted by other products, the suggestion in the letter is not persuasive.
last but not least, the author assumes that disasters can be prevented if consumer refuse to buy products related to ccc's copper. this assumption might be seemingly convincing, but further investigation weakens its credibility. if the majority revenue of ccc comes from cooperation with big companies or exported to other countries, instead of individual purchases, then such advocate would not be meaningful. In such cases, ccc can still make large profits and so no need to promise to consumer’s actions. What's more, the author fails to consider other factors resulting in disasters. environment">environmental damage can be caused by global warming, overhunting, overexploitation of lands and so forth, and simply limit one factor might be meaningless. For example, if copper mining only constitutes a small proportion of natural disaster, while overhunting cause more damage to endangered species, then passing laws inhibiting hunting might be more useful than limiting purchase of products made of ccc's copper. Therefore, the argument can be strengthened if we are offered evidences about severity caused by copper mining.
To sum up, as it stands, the conclusion by the editor is relied on several unstated and problematic stated assumptions that curtail the validity of the overall suggestion. To further strengthen the recommendation, the author ought to provide the evidences as follows: first, whether ccc will cause negative impact on environment; second, whether letting consumers not purchasing products made of ccc's copper is feasible and not affect normal living; last, whether environment">environmental condition will be better due to such policy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-20 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | yyusong | 69 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | yyusong | 69 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | AMARDEEP KOUR GEDHU | 49 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | greawyky | 69 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities.(78/114/116/117)"Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control serv 69
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields ofstudy that will prepare them for lucrative careers. 62
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 52
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, to the college's governing committee."Recently, there have been discussions about ending Grove College's century-old tr 72
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, to the college's governing committee."Recently, there have been discussions about ending Grove College's century-old tr 59
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 635 350
No. of Characters: 3338 1500
No. of Different Words: 282 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 5.02 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.257 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.804 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 269 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 191 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 142 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 92 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 35.278 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 18.116 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.375 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.571 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.146 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 474, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...se threat to endangered animal species. while declining to use products made with ccc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...n land would lead to natural disasters. if all equipment is environment'>envi...
^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ill threaten endangered animal species. it is true that west fredonia is home of s...
^^
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...hem habit on the land purchased by ccc? it is likely that west fredonia is very la...
^^
Line 3, column 727, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...fficient resources to live and survive. it is also plausible that those endangered...
^^
Line 3, column 727, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...fficient resources to live and survive. it is also plausible that those endangered...
^^
Line 6, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...purchase products made with ccc copper. this claim might make sense if people can re...
^^^^
Line 6, column 361, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...strongly affect peoples normal livings. if all those products are necessary goods ...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Last
... in the letter is not persuasive. last but not least, the author assumes that ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...to buy products related to cccs copper. this assumption might be seemingly convincin...
^^^^
Line 9, column 229, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... investigation weakens its credibility. if the majority revenue of ccc comes from ...
^^
Line 9, column 513, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... to promise to consumer's actions. Whats more, the author fails to consider othe...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 592, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Environment&apos
...r other factors resulting in disasters. environment'>environmental damage can be caused by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, then, therefore, while, for example, in addition, it is true, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.6327345309 158% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.9520958084 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 28.8173652695 115% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 55.5748502994 144% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 16.3942115768 171% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3450.0 2260.96107784 153% => OK
No of words: 631.0 441.139720559 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4675118859 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01195704033 4.56307096286 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48443461063 2.78398813304 125% => OK
Unique words: 301.0 204.123752495 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477020602219 0.468620217663 102% => OK
syllable_count: 1059.3 705.55239521 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.76447105788 160% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 2.70958083832 406% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.22255489022 237% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 19.7664670659 137% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8387420787 57.8364921388 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.777777778 119.503703932 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3703703704 23.324526521 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.70786347227 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.25449101796 247% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 6.88822355289 232% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213285839896 0.218282227539 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688538458837 0.0743258471296 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402054247238 0.0701772020484 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140792737358 0.128457276422 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389256975972 0.0628817314937 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.3799401198 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.3550499002 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.5979740519 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 166.0 98.500998004 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.