The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:
A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-aged children. Therefore, Seatown should institute a free-tuition policy for its professors for the purpose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors.
The policy for retention of professors can not be based upon a single point, there are multiple ways for retention of professors. The given stud doesn't mention other points. From my point of view, this study is incomplete and not based on thorough investigation.
The primary criteria of student to get in to university is the acceptance given by university to student. If you are offering free tuition to children of professors but they are failing to get acceptance by the university, this will not fulfill the purpose of professor retention. The university has to give preference to children of professor to get admission in the university and then offering free tuition,only giving a free tuition will not solve a problem.
Result obtained from study conducted in different university can not be applicable to other university. The ranking of oceania university might be higher or it is well known and reputed university where every parents want to sent their children.So, the professor in oceania university might want to get their children into same university. On the other hand, Seatown university may br not well known and low ranked university, the professor of this university will not be interested in getting admitted in same university. The faculty committee should look into this matter as well.
The policy for retention of professor can not be depend on single issue, there might be different issues like salary, university environment, working hours, research facilities available in university.
The faculty committee should ask their proffesors
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-08 | Keerthi98 | 33 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Opak Pulu | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | solankis304 | 63 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Deepali24 | 69 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | Siddhivinayak Shanbhagd | 49 | view |
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 40
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish. 33
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 37
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 33
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 33
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: The ranking of oceania university might be higher or it is well known and reputed university where every parents want to sent their children.So, the professor in oceania university might want to get their children into same university.
Error: oceania Suggestion: oceanic
Sentence: The faculty committee should ask their proffesors
Error: proffesors Suggestion: professors
----------------
argument 1 -- not OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
flaws:
No. of Words: 253 350
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 253 350
No. of Characters: 1288 1500
No. of Different Words: 121 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.988 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.091 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.8 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 94 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 79 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 58 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.083 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.004 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.417 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.39 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.676 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.138 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...retention of professors. The given stud doesnt mention other points. From my point of ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , only
...niversity and then offering free tuition,only giving a free tuition will not solve a ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...ery parents want to sent their children.So, the professor in oceania university mi...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... facilities available in university. The faculty committee should ask their prof...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, then, well, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 13.6137724551 7% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 28.8173652695 38% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 2260.96107784 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 250.0 441.139720559 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.308 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94082709454 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 204.123752495 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 705.55239521 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6352960748 57.8364921388 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.583333333 119.503703932 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 23.324526521 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.70786347227 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336709506616 0.218282227539 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123152843461 0.0743258471296 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531838602675 0.0701772020484 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165848343635 0.128457276422 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628002072657 0.0628817314937 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.3550499002 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.5979740519 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 98.500998004 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.