The author of the argument concludes that modifying showerheads in all twelve buildings will increase the profits further. However, that conclusion is based on number of inadequately supported assumptions. Without having more clarity on those assumptions, it is difficult to say whether it is right move.
To begin with, the author claims that there will be considerable amount of savings without analyzing the water consumption changes as water usage readings are not available. Without having sufficient data it cannot be decided that the step taken is fruitful. It would have been a fair argument if author would have made some arrangements to get water usage readings, analyze and then come to the conclusion.
Another weakness in the argument is, since there are a few complaints received on water pressure reduction, one cannot come to an conclusion that the residents are not bothered about it. There might be several reasons why several complaints are not received. For example, in past one month the number of residents who stayed in the apartments might be much lesser than previous months as residents might have gone for vacations. One more reason for few complaints is residents might have thought of giving it a try for sometime and may complain in the upcoming months. There could be many other reasons for not receiving many complaints. Just by observing one month change, one cannot come to a conclusion that the change is acceptable to the residents.
One more flaw in the conclusion made by author is that by making this change to all twelve buildings, the result will be same as three buildings. The major flaw is, this conclusion is made based on an assumption that the residents in twelve buildings' residents nature and attitude are similar first three buildings' residents. There might be a chance that people in first three buildings dont use shower much or maybe they are not much bothered about the water pressure. While the residents in remaining nine buildings might have more problems than the first three. Also, author made an assumption that reducing water flow will reduce water usage, there might be a chance that the residents in the nine buildings might spend more time than before in shower and reduction of flow of water will be compensated by the extra time usage while first three buildings spend similar time in showers irrespective of change in water flow.
At the end, unless these assumptions are made clear and there is sufficient data to analyze, Sunnyside Towers cannot come to a conclusion it is right step to modifying in twelve buildings.
- the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 66
- the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 66
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager One month ago all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one 58
- Claim Colleges and universities should specify all required courses and eliminate elective courses in order to provide clear guidance for students Reason College students like people in general prefer to follow directions rather than make their own decisi 50
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 430 350
No. of Characters: 2121 1500
No. of Different Words: 174 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.554 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.933 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.573 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 146 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 105 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 82 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.889 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.58 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.342 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.583 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.104 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had made'?
Suggestion: had made
...uld have been a fair argument if author would have made some arrangements to get water usage re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... pressure reduction, one cannot come to an conclusion that the residents are not b...
^^
Line 7, column 388, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ce that people in first three buildings dont use shower much or maybe they are not m...
^^^^
Line 7, column 471, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...much bothered about the water pressure. While the residents in remaining nine buildin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, then, while, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.9520958084 162% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 55.5748502994 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2171.0 2260.96107784 96% => OK
No of words: 430.0 441.139720559 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0488372093 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6426638559 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 204.123752495 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43023255814 0.468620217663 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 674.1 705.55239521 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8164535322 57.8364921388 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.611111111 119.503703932 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 23.324526521 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.70786347227 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179797861298 0.218282227539 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569277940033 0.0743258471296 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043707547474 0.0701772020484 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901543443106 0.128457276422 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401991573349 0.0628817314937 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 98.500998004 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.