The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station.
"WWAC must change from its current rock-music format because the number of listeners has been declining, even though the population in our listening area has been growing. The population growth has resulted mainly from people moving to our area after their retirement, and we must make listeners of these new residents. But they seem to have limited interest in music: several local stores selling recorded music have recently closed. Therefore, just changing to another kind of music is not going to increase our audience. Instead, we should adopt a news-and-talk format, a form of radio that is increasingly popular in our area."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
In the memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station, he suggests the WWAC radio station to shift from their current rock-music format to a news-and-talk format, which he claims to be popular in that area. He assumes that this shift would result in an increase in their audience base. He makes this claims based on the fact that the locals of that area have a limited interest in music which was the reason for the local stores selling recorded music to be closed. Therefore, he suggests that changing the genre of music will not increase the number of listeners. This claim made by the manager is based on several unwarranted assumptions and in order to properly evaluate this argument, two questions need to be answered.
Firstly, the author assumes that the new residents of the area does not have any interest in music. He makes such an assumption based on the fact that the local stores selling recorded music have closed. However, there are many different possibilities that could have led to the decline in the number of listeners and to the closing of the stores. The author mentions that a large number of people have moved to that locality after retirement. But the author doesn't provide any evidence that describes their interest in music. It is possible that those new residents are interested in classical music than rock music. It is possible that the local stores were selling only rock music and this could have led to the closing of such stores. Therefore, there isn't sufficient evidence to prove that the locals in that area lack interest in music. If the above mentioned scenario is given merit, then it would significantly weaken the author's argument.
Furthermore, the author recommends the WWAC radio station to adopt a news-and-talk format to increase their audience base. The author claims this format is increasingly popular in that area. But, there is an important question that need to be answered to properly evaluate his claim: How does the author arrive at the conclusion that news-and-talk format is popular in that area? There are no evidences provided by the author to support this claim. For instance, was a survey conducted among the locals over their preferences? Or, is there any other radio station in that area that is successful by adopting the suggested format? If yes, adopting the same format would be repetitive and this would not guarantee an increase in audience base. Providing evidences to the above mentioned questions can strengthen the author's argument.
In conclusion, the argument made by the author heavily rests on unwarranted assumptions and providing evidence to the above mentioned questions can help evaluate the argument in a better manner.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-29 | d_kumar | 66 | view |
| 2021-07-03 | piyushac123 | 60 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | yoferip | 68 | view |
| 2021-03-17 | UnicornCookie | 83 | view |
| 2020-08-22 | dac00 | 50 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 66
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 50
- educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppor 54
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...d music have closed. However, there are many different possibilities that could have led to th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...of the stores. The author mentions that a large number of people have moved to that locality afte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...cality after retirement. But the author doesnt provide any evidence that describes the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 757, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...losing of such stores. Therefore, there isnt sufficient evidence to prove that the l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 931, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... then it would significantly weaken the authors argument. Furthermore, the author r...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 815, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... mentioned questions can strengthen the authors argument. In conclusion, the argumen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 13.6137724551 169% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 28.8173652695 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 55.5748502994 112% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2263.0 2260.96107784 100% => OK
No of words: 451.0 441.139720559 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0177383592 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63187207249 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 204.123752495 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.39689578714 0.468620217663 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 714.6 705.55239521 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8676225255 57.8364921388 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3913043478 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6086956522 23.324526521 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13043478261 5.70786347227 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.20758483034 171% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174143515175 0.218282227539 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558820886207 0.0743258471296 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745975575028 0.0701772020484 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097828940819 0.128457276422 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719482844613 0.0628817314937 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 98.500998004 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...d music have closed. However, there are many different possibilities that could have led to th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...of the stores. The author mentions that a large number of people have moved to that locality afte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...cality after retirement. But the author doesnt provide any evidence that describes the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 757, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...losing of such stores. Therefore, there isnt sufficient evidence to prove that the l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 931, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... then it would significantly weaken the authors argument. Furthermore, the author r...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 815, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... mentioned questions can strengthen the authors argument. In conclusion, the argumen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 13.6137724551 169% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 28.8173652695 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 55.5748502994 112% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2263.0 2260.96107784 100% => OK
No of words: 451.0 441.139720559 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0177383592 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63187207249 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 204.123752495 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.39689578714 0.468620217663 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 714.6 705.55239521 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8676225255 57.8364921388 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3913043478 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6086956522 23.324526521 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13043478261 5.70786347227 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.20758483034 171% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174143515175 0.218282227539 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558820886207 0.0743258471296 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745975575028 0.0701772020484 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097828940819 0.128457276422 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719482844613 0.0628817314937 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 98.500998004 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.