The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company.
"Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy. At the same time, manufacturers are now marketing many home appliances, such as refrigerators and air conditioners, that are almost twice as energy efficient as those sold a decade ago. Also, new technologies for better home insulation and passive solar heating are readily available to reduce the energy needed for home heating. Therefore, the total demand for electricity in our area will not increase — and may decline slightly. Since our three electric generating plants in operation for the past twenty years have always met our needs, construction of new generating plants will not be necessary."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
While it might be true that home owners are interested to conserve energy; however, the author's argument does not make a cogent sense. It is easy to understand that more efficient home appliances those save energy and new home insulation technologies are available, but this argument is rife with holes and assumptions, therefor not strong enough to guarantee energy conservation by home owners.
The author indicates that recent surveys shows that home owners wants to save more energy; however, the author does not provide any further information about surveys' sample group and type of questions. For example, it could be just few yes and no questions from small sample group which is not valuable results. Moreover, there is no guarantee if sample groups are going to conserve energy or not. To strengthen his or her argument, the author needs investigation about all home owners eager to conserve energy and their energy consuming amount.
Additionally, the author mentions that better home insulation technologies and more efficient home appliances are available, but the author does not talk about the price which is an important factor. If those home energy consuming devices such as refrigerators and air conditioners are expensive, residents are not going to buy them. As a result, there will be no energy conservation.
The author implies that construction of new generating plants is not necessary because energy demand will decrease based on past assumptions and also because there are already three twenty years old electric generating. However, the author does not mention about total population change during past twenty years that is essential to know. Moreover, one or two of the old generating might need to be replaced which will cost money.
This suggestion is persuasive when the author gathers information about population change, home electric instruments' prices, and survey details. After answering these questions, the author can make such a conclusion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 59 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | abhikhanna | 69 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | myfavpear | 62 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | myfavpear | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | abhikhanna | 75 | view |
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another Write a resp 50
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for th 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 58
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppo 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...rested to conserve energy; however, the authors argument does not make a cogent sense. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun yes seems to be countable; consider using: 'few yeses', 'few yesses'.
Suggestion: few yeses; few yesses
...uestions. For example, it could be just few yes and no questions from small sample grou...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 546, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ergy and their energy consuming amount. Additionally, the author mentions that b...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 28.8173652695 66% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 55.5748502994 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 312.0 441.139720559 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36217948718 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77407688208 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 204.123752495 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532051282051 0.468620217663 114% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3859869266 57.8364921388 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 23.324526521 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.70786347227 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212013576654 0.218282227539 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754094971919 0.0743258471296 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598477754736 0.0701772020484 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124280634664 0.128457276422 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654898065625 0.0628817314937 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.3799401198 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.3550499002 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.5979740519 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...rested to conserve energy; however, the authors argument does not make a cogent sense. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun yes seems to be countable; consider using: 'few yeses', 'few yesses'.
Suggestion: few yeses; few yesses
...uestions. For example, it could be just few yes and no questions from small sample grou...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 546, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ergy and their energy consuming amount. Additionally, the author mentions that b...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 28.8173652695 66% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 55.5748502994 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 312.0 441.139720559 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36217948718 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77407688208 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 204.123752495 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532051282051 0.468620217663 114% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3859869266 57.8364921388 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 23.324526521 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.70786347227 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212013576654 0.218282227539 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754094971919 0.0743258471296 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598477754736 0.0701772020484 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124280634664 0.128457276422 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654898065625 0.0628817314937 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.3799401198 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.3550499002 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.5979740519 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.