The regional manager’s conclusion for switching all restaurants from Taste of Italy restaurant chain to the Chipless brand of Wine glasses feels extremely weak considering the inadequate data examples mentioned by him.
Firstly, the remark of breaking of glass is dependent on the type of wineglass, based on the inputs and suggestions from the Servers and Bartenders from all restaurants, is lacking the statistical evidence. If manager has given details in the form of percentages, bar charts, Pareto charts, etc., that would have strengthen the gathered data from servers and bartenders. The unavailability of these details leads to questioning the information for the number of restaurants in Taste of Italy restaurant chain, number of servers and bartenders interviewed and the timeline for this survey. With this, it is challenging to support Manager’s conclusion due to lack of evidence.
Also, the conclusion for switching all the restaurants to Chipless brand isn’t justifiable based on the supposedly concrete observations from Flatplains mall, because that mall has been open for service from one month only. The data for one month and from only one restaurant isn’t quite reliable to take decision like this. The rate of wine glass breaking depends on so many factors including the trained restaurant staff for the serving methods, rush hours, restaurant floor finishing, etc. There might be change in this trend post one month and so manager should consider monitoring the data for several months or several years.
Furthermore, the Customers’ liking for Chipless brand at Flatplains mall might have some unstated and unknown reasons. Perhaps, the Flatplains restaurant is located in the vicinity of many Multinational companies and the other restaurants might be located in suburbs. This changes the Customers preference and liking for the type of Wine glasses. Thereby, these things should be examined while concluding that what worked for the Flatplains restaurants would work for all restaurants.
Hence, the complete detailed and thorough data analysis from all the restaurants in the Taste of Italy restaurant chain, should be considered for concluding which types of glasses suits the best for each one.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 348 350
No. of Characters: 1838 1500
No. of Different Words: 171 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.319 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.282 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.834 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 128 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 81 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 59 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.769 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.161 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.538 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.377 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.641 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.098 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...conclusion for switching all restaurants from Taste of Italy restaurant chain to ...
^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'strengthened'.
Suggestion: strengthened
...s, Pareto charts, etc., that would have strengthen the gathered data from servers and bart...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'supporting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: supporting
...is survey. With this, it is challenging to support Manager’s conclusion due to lack of evi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 633, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ta for several months or several years. Furthermore, the Customers’ liking for C...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vicinity of many Multinational companies and the other restaurants might be locat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 28.8173652695 42% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 55.5748502994 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 2260.96107784 84% => OK
No of words: 346.0 441.139720559 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49132947977 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90676739159 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505780346821 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 705.55239521 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1276969972 57.8364921388 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.714285714 119.503703932 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 23.324526521 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 5.70786347227 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309502921787 0.218282227539 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120089547901 0.0743258471296 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831473062045 0.0701772020484 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211805432294 0.128457276422 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703340950012 0.0628817314937 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.3799401198 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.5979740519 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.