The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term We urge all of our clients to invest in this new company For the first time in ten years a company that has developed satellite te

The advice in the newsletter is urging investors to invest in Techcorporation because the author belives that people would switch from their current satellite televison provider to Techcorporation based on the evidence that they complained last year about being dissatisfied with their current provider. However, before investors heed to this advice, it would be wise if answers to some questions partaining the above claim is provided.

Firstly, has the issue which the customers complained about been resolved? The author of the advice is assuming that the satellite television provider have not resolved the issues their customers complained about. It could be that the majority of their complaint were about minor issues which have been resolved. If this were the case, customers would not be prompted to leave their current satellite provider for another one. Hence, it would be better to know the answer to this before urging investors to invest in Techcorporation.

Another question that would need to be answered before promting investors to invest would be, how many people responded to the survey compared to the number of people using the current television satellite provider? It is possible that there are over a thousand people using the satellite provider's service and only ten of them responded to the survey. If this were the case, it would mean that only eight people out of a thousand complained about the satellite provider. And comapring it to the thousands of people using the current satellite provider, it would not be advisable for investors to invest in Techcorporation, because it is possible that it is only these eight people that are seeking new satellite provider out of the thousands of users.

Moreover, it would be a wise decision to know exactly how comaprable Techcorporation is to the current satellite provider in terms of services rendered. The author assumes that Techcorporation would be better than the current satellite provider. However, if Techcorporation turns out to be worse in this regards, investing in Techcorporation would be lead to losses on the part of the investors. Therefore, providing an answer to this question will help investors to determine if it is worth investing in Techcorporation.

In conclusion, the author should be diligent in answering these questions before urging investors to put their money in the new satellite television provider, Techcorporation.

Votes
Average: 6.4 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 300, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...echcorporation turns out to be worse in this regards, investing in Techcorporation w...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 11.1786427146 18% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 28.8173652695 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2054.0 2260.96107784 91% => OK
No of words: 384.0 441.139720559 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34895833333 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05238106483 2.78398813304 110% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 204.123752495 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.393229166667 0.468620217663 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 643.5 705.55239521 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5618444022 57.8364921388 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.375 119.503703932 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.324526521 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.70786347227 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179278770475 0.218282227539 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784804070638 0.0743258471296 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460263187206 0.0701772020484 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120705578757 0.128457276422 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285978990989 0.0628817314937 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.3799401198 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.3550499002 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.5979740519 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 98.500998004 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 384 350
No. of Characters: 2008 1500
No. of Different Words: 145 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.427 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.229 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.973 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 152 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 115 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 94 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.611 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.562 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.413 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.631 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.192 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5