The following appeared in a newspaper article about law firms in the city of Megalopolis.
In Megalopolis, the number of law school graduates who went to work for large, corporate firms declined by 15 percent over the last three years, whereas an increasing number of graduates took jobs at small, general practice firms. Even though large firms usually offer much higher salaries, law school graduates are choosing to work for the smaller firms most likely because they experience greater job satisfaction at smaller firms. In a survey of first-year students at a leading law school, most agreed with the statement that earning a high salary was less important to them than job satisfaction. This finding suggests that the large, corporate firms of Megalopolis will need to offer graduates more benefits and incentives and reduce the number of hours they must work.
It is stated that the large cap companies in Megalopolis should improve their working policies in order to attract candidates from universities. This conclusion is based on the decrease of the number of graduates in large and corporate firms, a higher level of job satisfaction in small, general practice firms by a survey from a group of first year students. However, before this recommendation is properly evaluated, three problems should be elucidate.
First of all, the decline of 15% of the proportion of law school candidates who worked for big and corporate companies and the contrast trend in small companies in three consecutive years does not mean that there is lack of preference to work in big companies. One of the reasons is that there is less career opportunities in these companies, then the percentage of graduates working in big corporations could witness the gradual decrease. Further, candidates also can require passing the entrance test. As the result, the number of graduates working in big companies is limited, while it is likely to be easier to work in small companies. If either of these scenarios has merit, then conclusion drawn in the original argument is significantly hampered.
Secondly, the results in the surveillance based on first year students can be not strong enough to extrapolate, generalize and predict about the graduates. There are many distinct characteristics and differences between freshmen and graduates. For example, many first-year students want to follow their career based on job satisfaction, while it is more realistic for graduates to work in big companies with a higher level of salary to pay their loans and make ends meet. If the above is true, then the argument does not hold water.
Finally, there is no reason to assert that workers in large companies do not gain more many benefits, incentives, and job satisfaction than those of small companies. In fact, large companies usually provide many supports for their employees as well as higher salary. Moreover, employees in these companies also have more opportunities to broaden their horizon by working in many positions and places. In various situations, it is quite difficult for small companies to attract candidates due to challenges about work environment and job satisfaction. These reasons can damage substantially the credibility of the argument.
In conclusion, the argument, as it stands now, is considerably flawed due to its reliance on several unwarranted assumptions. If the author can resolve these problems above and offer more evidence, then it will be fully possible to evaluate the viability of the proposed recommendation to give more benefits and incentives and reduce working time in big corporations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-05 | Imran Wazi | 68 | view |
| 2020-09-01 | Shreyan36 | 68 | view |
| 2020-06-29 | nguyenngoc04061995@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2016-01-06 | sherko | 40 | view |
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the vice president of Health Naturally a small but expanding chain of stores selling health food and other health related products Our previous experience has been that our stores are most profitable in ar 87
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore a chain of movie rental stores quot In order to stop the recent decline in our profits we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore 039 s ten movie rental stores Since we ar 50
- The following appeared in a newspaper article about law firms in the city of Megalopolis In Megalopolis the number of law school graduates who went to work for large corporate firms declined by 15 percent over the last three years whereas an increasing nu 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 445, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'elucidated'?
Suggestion: elucidated
...rly evaluated, three problems should be elucidate. First of all, the decline of 15% of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 55.5748502994 122% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2306.0 2260.96107784 102% => OK
No of words: 437.0 441.139720559 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27688787185 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04234248693 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 204.123752495 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491990846682 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 705.55239521 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.70958083832 295% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2763499542 57.8364921388 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.368421053 119.503703932 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.324526521 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73684210526 5.70786347227 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177357607606 0.218282227539 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485484609231 0.0743258471296 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543848520719 0.0701772020484 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939615342164 0.128457276422 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572028595527 0.0628817314937 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.3799401198 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.3550499002 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.5979740519 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 98.500998004 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 445, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'elucidated'?
Suggestion: elucidated
...rly evaluated, three problems should be elucidate. First of all, the decline of 15% of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 55.5748502994 122% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2306.0 2260.96107784 102% => OK
No of words: 437.0 441.139720559 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27688787185 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04234248693 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 204.123752495 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491990846682 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 705.55239521 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.70958083832 295% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2763499542 57.8364921388 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.368421053 119.503703932 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.324526521 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73684210526 5.70786347227 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177357607606 0.218282227539 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485484609231 0.0743258471296 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543848520719 0.0701772020484 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939615342164 0.128457276422 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572028595527 0.0628817314937 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.3799401198 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.3550499002 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.5979740519 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 98.500998004 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.