The following memo was published by the Welzaton City Commission A recent nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a safety helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whe

The memo published by Welzaton City Commission states that 10 years ago 35 percent of bicyclists wore helmets and recently that number has risen upto 80%, despite this there has been a 200% increase in serious bike accidents, according to the memo this is because 75% of the cyclists feel safer when wearing a helmet and in turn end up taking more risks. This explanation while completely logical isn't necessarily true, there are a number of alternative explanations that can better account for the rise in bicycle accidents.

It is possible that in the last few years the number of cars on the road has increased drastically, increase in the traffic of motor vehicles can contribute towards the rise in serious bike accidents, since accidents involving only bicycles are rarely serious. Accidents with cars on other hand are almost always ones that cause serious injuries.

Another possible explanation is that the serious accidents that take place mostly involve cyclist who don't wear helmets and aren't that keen on safety in the first place. This would easily debunk the theory stating that cyclist get into accidents because helmets make them feel safer than they are.

Also, if we look at the statistics closely, a 200% increase sounds much more dramatic than it actually is, for example: if 10 years ago there were 5 serious bicycle accidents per week, then a 200% increase would mean that the number has now increased to 15, which isn't a lot considering that the number of people who ride bicycles has also increased in the past 10 years.

According to the memo, the increase in serious bicycle accidents is because 75% of the cyclists feel safer when wearing a helmet and take more risks. But this explanation fails to take into account the increase in other motor vehicles on the road and whether the bicyclists getting into accidents are the ones wearing helmets in the first place. Additionally a statistical analysis reveals that a 200% increase isn't that high when considering that the total number of cyclist has also increased drastically.

Votes
Average: 6.2 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...is explanation while completely logical isnt necessarily true, there are a number of...
^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t take place mostly involve cyclist who dont wear helmets and arent that keen on saf...
^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...volve cyclist who dont wear helmets and arent that keen on safety in the first place....
^^^^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...e number has now increased to 15, which isnt a lot considering that the number of pe...
^^^^
Line 9, column 347, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...nes wearing helmets in the first place. Additionally a statistical analysis reveals that a 2...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 412, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...l analysis reveals that a 200% increase isnt that high when considering that the tot...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, look, so, then, while, for example, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 13.6137724551 147% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 16.3942115768 18% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 2260.96107784 76% => OK
No of words: 345.0 441.139720559 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99130434783 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52635592704 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 204.123752495 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48115942029 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.8473053892 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.9727180872 57.8364921388 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.2 119.503703932 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5 23.324526521 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.70786347227 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181589668061 0.218282227539 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811137972179 0.0743258471296 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842681944534 0.0701772020484 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110398465834 0.128457276422 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823483305552 0.0628817314937 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 14.3799401198 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 48.3550499002 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.197005988 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 98.500998004 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 12.3882235529 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.1389221557 140% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.9071856287 160% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 350 350
No. of Characters: 1677 1500
No. of Different Words: 163 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.325 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.791 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.534 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 116 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 57 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 35 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 17.123 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.449 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.722 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.15 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5