The president makes a recommendation based on there different surveys of faculty members, students and allumnae that Grove College should preserve its tradition of all-female education. The argument seems appealing, however, a few questions should be answered in order to evaluate the recommendation.
The argument would be undermined if the statement made by the faculty members that coeducation would encourage more students to apply to Grove is proved to be false. By spurning the old tradition, surely some parents who are in favor of the all-female education would not send their daughters to Grove, thus there may be a significent drop of the numbers of females. Also, considering that the school may not be well prepared to educate male students, it is plausible that few males will apply to Grove. All in all, it is dubious that the number of students would increase.
Questions that whether the students' opinions are reasonable should be answered. If the survey conducted by the students government only be responded by few students, the results are doubtful. Also, the range of students should be showed because the survey may deliberately ask conservative students thus it will result in conservative outcome.
The number of total alumnae and the ones who responded to the survey should be provided. If the school has few alumnae, the result could not be representive. Also, how can they be sure that the ones who opposed coeducation would give financial support to the college rather than the ones who espoued it?
In conclusion, questions of the three surveys should be answered to evaluate the recommendation. Only providing results within large group, the recommendation could be resonable.
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 58
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 50
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d 66
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed. 50
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, to the college's governing committee."We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female education rathe 37
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: The president makes a recommendation based on there different surveys of faculty members, students and allumnae that Grove College should preserve its tradition of all-female education.
Error: all-female Suggestion: all female
Error: allumnae Suggestion: alumnae
Sentence: By spurning the old tradition, surely some parents who are in favor of the all-female education would not send their daughters to Grove, thus there may be a significent drop of the numbers of females.
Error: significent Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: If the school has few alumnae, the result could not be representive.
Error: representive Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Also, how can they be sure that the ones who opposed coeducation would give financial support to the college rather than the ones who espoued it?
Error: espoued Suggestion: espoused
Sentence: Only providing results within large group, the recommendation could be resonable.
Error: resonable Suggestion: No alternate word
---------------------
flaws:
the arguments are not on the right track.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 274 350
No. of Characters: 1400 1500
No. of Different Words: 134 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.069 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.109 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.852 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 106 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 86 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.571 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.188 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.643 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.369 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.649 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rder to evaluate the recommendation. The argument would be undermined if the sta...
^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...nswered. If the survey conducted by the students government only be responded by few stu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...results are doubtful. Also, the range of students should be showed because the su...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, thus, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.9520958084 147% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 11.1786427146 18% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 55.5748502994 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 2260.96107784 64% => OK
No of words: 274.0 441.139720559 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27737226277 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94705260885 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 204.123752495 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 705.55239521 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0656071646 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.285714286 119.503703932 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 23.324526521 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 5.70786347227 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132172421741 0.218282227539 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519592178171 0.0743258471296 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785135481954 0.0701772020484 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0834597661307 0.128457276422 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786758365507 0.0628817314937 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.5979740519 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 98.500998004 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.