Will human mind always be superior to machines? The arguer promotes the recommendation because he thinks machines are only tools of human minds. Nevertheless, in my consideration, the definition of "superior" should be clarified. I would like to suggest that in a long period of time, the human mind will be superior to machines in the degree of self-consciousness, however, as to the level of intelligence, the machines may overshadow the human.
On the one hand, the human minds are superior to machines due to their high level of self-consciousness, which is not found yet in the Artificial Intelligence. A philosopher Searle claims that the machines would not become self-awared by describing the procedure of their calculations simply as the meaningless output of data according to the formulated rules. They cannot have an understanding of the purpose and the reasons of the data, which contradicts with human minds and could draw a conclusion that their minds are inferior to human's in self-consciousness.
On the other hand, however, in the future, it is dubious whether the intelligence of human will outwit the machines'. An AI, known as Artificial Intelligence, could consider thoroughly on alternative tactics and carefully calculate the data, thus it could make more insightful decisions than humans. For instance, the AlphaGo, an AI programed to play chess with the self-learning adaptive functions, defeated loads of chess masters during the past years, including the world champion, Jie Ke. With the somber calculation and thorough comparison, the minds of the machines could surely be superior to human in the future considering the level of intelligence.
Also, we should always make sure that the machines are merely the tools of human. In order to prevent the machines from growing self-awareness and disobeying humans' dictatorship, which is the common situation in science fictions, we should carefully inhibit the development of their intelligence. In sum, we should make sure that we are superior in self-awareness.
To sum up, as I have cogently discussed above, I can comfortably draw a conclusion that the human minds are superior to the machines in the degree of self-consicousness, while they may be inferior to the machines when talking about the level of intelligence. We should be aware of the self-consciouness of machines and make use of their high intelligence, and make sure that they are only the tools of human.
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 50
- Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment. 33
- A recently issued twenty-year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. 65
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 70
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... I would like to suggest that in a long period of time, the human mind will be superior to mac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, while, as to, for instance, talking about, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30102040816 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46021822468 2.79657885939 124% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456632653061 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.3399444029 60.3974514979 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.533333333 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1333333333 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 5.21951772744 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307792223091 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139366557504 0.0831039109588 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972671403165 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19508894588 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077623071891 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.