The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies that any

The recommendation from the passage obviously shows the concerns of a movie production company over its inability to reach a wider audience through advertising. However, the first question that needs to be answered is "what is the cost of attending and watching super-screen produced movies?", it might be that the company increased its pricing or that the people are not financially buoyant to pay for movies. If this is the case, the company needs to review its pricing and not increase its budget for advertising.

Also, if the event was virtual, it could be that one user paid for the event and watched movies with friends and families as in the case of Netflix for example. This explains the increase in the number of positive reviews which does not match with the number of attendees. So the company should regulate users on their platform and not increase the advertising budget.
A reduction in the number of people might also be a result of the weather condition at the time, it might not have been favorable for people to attend.

In addition, the company assumed it might not be a fault from the marketing department, take as an instance, it might be that the marketing department has been targeting the wrong audience for their kind of movies, how have they been using the already allocated resources to target the right audience? If it is wrongly done or skills are lacking, the company should solve the challenges existing in their marketing department instead of increasing budget the next year.

Finally, People might not really be interested in the newly released super screen movies, the increased positive review might be from the number of people that watched and loved it as against other years where people gave negative reviews about the movie, well, the company should instead find out what changed and try to serve their target audience better instead of allocating a greater share of its budget to marketing.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, really, so, well, for example, in addition, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 55.5748502994 68% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 2260.96107784 72% => OK
No of words: 327.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98470948012 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61473791446 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501529051988 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 705.55239521 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.5651561151 57.8364921388 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.0 119.503703932 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7 23.324526521 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.70786347227 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197227466247 0.218282227539 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078983888323 0.0743258471296 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054370160527 0.0701772020484 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107908556277 0.128457276422 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534442137206 0.0628817314937 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 14.3799401198 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.3550499002 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 327 350
No. of Characters: 1576 1500
No. of Different Words: 159 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.252 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.82 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.479 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 118 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 86 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 53 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 32.7 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 16.205 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.41 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.649 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.092 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5