Governments should place few if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Scientific research and development are basic for the world’s advancement. The recommendation no doubt suggests more like a monitoring and control measure towards research and development, a reason might be to minimize hazards that follow scientific errors, another reason might be to regulate and approve scientific research and development after passing requirements. However, it is pertinent to note that evolution, innovations, and scientific development so far did not face restrictions by an authority, they might have had limitations in the process but it was something that was within their control and not imposed.
Taking attention to the topic, the restriction mentioned in the recommendation is unclear, it might not be favorable to a segment of scientists and developers, if only opinions will be sought from the primary movers; scientists, that would be a different case. Well, a key question that must be answered is “why are restrictions needed for scientific research and development?”
To reject the recommendation, a circumstance in which the effect of the recommendation will not be advantageous is with the case of individual scientists without formal affiliations or connections with people in power and authority. For example, a scientist can be in a tiny space and an idea of how science can solve existing problems on earth drops into his head. Now, imagine there are few restrictions either regulatory, financial, approval, etc. placed by the government, of course, there will be a reduction in enthusiasm and eagerness to try something new. The scientist might not be able to meet certain requirements in order to be approved to carry out the test? Possibly, the scientist might be confident enough to carry out the test knowing that the government might likely come up with a case against him in the long run.
In conclusion, knowing fully well that innovation can be engendered from anyone, anywhere, and with anything, a restriction should therefore not be encouraged.
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 50
- Essay topics The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that 58
- women and men should carry task according to their inherent physical differences 66
- Teachers salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 66
- The first step to self knowledge is a rejection of the familiar Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Placed
...r regulatory, financial, approval, etc. placed by the government, of course, there wil...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 316.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36075949367 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26878361515 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569620253165 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.4828114987 60.3974514979 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.0 118.986275619 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7272727273 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 5.21951772744 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166466849973 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721966648297 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603722247611 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104626011204 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428738552557 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.