The following is taken from a memo from the advertising the director of the Super screen movie production company According to a recent report from a marketing department during the past year fewer people attended super screen produce movies than in any o

Essay topics:

The following is taken from a memo from the advertising the director of the Super screen movie production company.
According to a recent report from a marketing department during the past year fewer people attended super screen produce movies than in any other year and yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific screen movie actually increase during the past year. Clearly, the content of these reviews are not reaching enough of our perspective viewers. thus the problem lies not in the quality of a movie but with the public's lack of awareness that the movie of good quality are available. super screenshot should therefore allocate a greater of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising.

The adversting director of Super Screen Movie Production Company in his memo concludes that they should allocate a greater share of company budget towards advertisment in the next financial year. To conclude this the director has given different facts and figures in his memo. The argument is not persuasive and it is logically incorrect.
First, the director says that in the report from the marketing department, it has come forward that few people attended the Super Screen produce movie this year compare to the previous year. It could have happen that the report is taken from a small geographical area and not all of the area was considered under the survey. Unless, we know what all area was considered for the report we cannot conlcude that anything.
Secondly, it could have happen that the people living in the area from which the report was taken they could have find some other source of entertainment. So, this might be a reason that fewer people are coming to watch the movies. Unless, we know that there is no other kind of entertainment in the area, we cannot conclude that the people are not aware of the movie.
Thirdly, the director claims that even though the number of movie watcher has gone down, but the percentage of positive reviews has not decrease. This could have happen that the movie produce by Suoer Screen production might have increase the price of the tickets of the movie. As a result most of the people could not afford to watch the film, and the people who could are giving the postive feedback. So, the results have not changed. Unless, we come to know that whether the company has increased the price or not, we cannot compare it with the previous year data.
Fourthly, the director conlcudes that the qulaity of movie has not decrease. It could be that the company is producing similar type of content and the people are bored watching the same old content. It might happen that the people are aware of the new movie launch by the company, but they are not interested in watching it.
To increase the movie watchers, the director of Super Screen, concludes that they
should increase the money on advertisment. It could happen that the people are aware of the movie and are not choosing to watch it. This could due to many reasons like the cost of tickets have increase, people have found another source of entertainment, they are not intreseted in watching the similar movie concept which might be presented to them by the company. So, even after the company spends more money on advertisment, the results would be positive there is no surety. Before the company finilaize to spend the money they should look at the different see all the facts which are mention above and see to it that is that one of the reason why the number of people going to watch the movie has decrease this year.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-19 shubham1102 55 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user shubham1102 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 206, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'happened'.
Suggestion: happened
...are to the previous year. It could have happen that the report is taken from a small g...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... from a small geographical area and not all of the area was considered under the survey. U...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'happened'.
Suggestion: happened
...hat anything. Secondly, it could have happen that the people living in the area from...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'found'.
Suggestion: found
...ch the report was taken they could have find some other source of entertainment. So,...
^^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'decreased'.
Suggestion: decreased
... percentage of positive reviews has not decrease. This could have happen that the movie ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'happened'.
Suggestion: happened
...views has not decrease. This could have happen that the movie produce by Suoer Screen ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'decreased'.
Suggestion: decreased
...cudes that the qulaity of movie has not decrease. It could be that the company is produc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tor of Super Screen, concludes that they should increase the money on advertismen...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, kind of, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.9520958084 154% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 13.6137724551 169% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 28.8173652695 177% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 55.5748502994 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2340.0 2260.96107784 103% => OK
No of words: 496.0 441.139720559 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71774193548 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3615644947 2.78398813304 85% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 204.123752495 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.387096774194 0.468620217663 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 723.6 705.55239521 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 4.96107784431 302% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1775389782 57.8364921388 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.363636364 119.503703932 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 23.324526521 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.70786347227 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2922010333 0.218282227539 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891632036301 0.0743258471296 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090916629603 0.0701772020484 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170172386826 0.128457276422 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706982462275 0.0628817314937 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.3799401198 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.3550499002 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.5979740519 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.32208582834 88% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 98.500998004 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 8 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 496 350
No. of Characters: 2283 1500
No. of Different Words: 183 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.719 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.603 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.282 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 150 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 97 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.545 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.099 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.455 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.345 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.345 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.116 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5