The government in Littleville plans to build a large mall in a newly constructed zone just outside the city. Littleville hopes to attract many wealthy clients who it believes will shop at the Littleville Mall's many planned boutique stores. Ten years ago, Bigsburgh, a city in the same province, built an upscale mall in its fashionable downtown district. The mall was an instant success, so Littleville Mall can expect a similar return on revenue in the first year of its opening. So you can see here that, okay, we have this argument statement. It's lot much longer than the issue, and it's making certain assumptions.
The above statement is flawed for numerous reasons. Primarily, the argument is based on unwarranted assumptions that the city of Littleville and Bigsburgh are the same, rendering the conclusion that the mall of Littleville will follow the success of the mall in Bighsbargh which is invalid.
The argument does not provide any justification that the two cities are similar in terms of population. For instance, the people of Bigsbargh may be wealthier than those of Littleville. This important difference might create hindrance in the success of the mall in Littleville. More significantly, the argument states that the mall hopes to attract the wealthier clients. If the majority of people of Littleville are middle and lower class, then the assumption that the rich people of the city will patron the mall have no basis. Had the argument provide information regarding the similarity in income of the people of two cities’ residents? Even, then the argument has to provide information that like the people of Bigsbagh, the people of Littleville tend to spend money in the mall.
The argument also leaves many other unanswered questions. Even if the people of Littleville are wealthy enough to patron boutique stores, they are not necessarily likely to travel to newly construction zone. Nonetheless, the argument assumes that because the residents of Bigsburgh frequented to mall in a fashionable central location, so the people of Litteville will also travel to outside city area to visit the newly established mall.
Finally, the argument claims without warrant that what happened ten years ago will hold true today. SO even if we assume that the people of Litteville are same as the people of Bigsburgh, the still argument is still lacking because within ten years time period the economic condition has also been changed.
Because, the argument makes several unwarranted assumptions, therefore, it fails to make a convincing case that mall of Littelville will mirror the success of the mall of Bigsburgh.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-12 | gkbiswas | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-24 | manikantanalla | 63 | view |
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to read books on an electronic device than it is to read traditional books on paper 73
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 85
- The city council of Town x has proposed reducing the city’s electric expenses by switching all the lights in the public buildings from incandescent bulbs to light emitting diodes (LEDs). The switch would be made gradually as the old incandescent bulbs 63
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 323 350
No. of Characters: 1651 1500
No. of Different Words: 159 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.239 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.111 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.784 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 123 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 92 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 68 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.533 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.763 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.404 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.568 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.114 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the success of the mall of Bigsburgh.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 11.1786427146 18% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 16.3942115768 134% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 2260.96107784 75% => OK
No of words: 323.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26625386997 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90507747263 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504643962848 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 705.55239521 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6841977206 57.8364921388 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.4 119.503703932 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 23.324526521 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.70786347227 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224644508033 0.218282227539 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790579472199 0.0743258471296 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685381598707 0.0701772020484 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135123335566 0.128457276422 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622455321683 0.0628817314937 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.3550499002 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.5979740519 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 98.500998004 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.