In the argument, the author is trying to say that the extinctions of the mammal species in the Kaliko Island regions cannot be due to actions of the humans that migrated into the forest some 7000 years ago due to sparse nature of evidence. Though author seems to believe such a hypothesis his claim is fallacious and has the lack of details to support the argument.
Exploiting these mistakes we can see that it's not compelling at all. Firstly, there is a difference of 4,000 years between the era in which mammals species extinction occurred and humans moved into the forest. Anything without enough facts or evidence can't be put into certainty, be it humans hunted these animals or an environmental calamity caused the extinction. Author fails to provide any strength to the argument, it's just stated that there wasn't much proof that could lead to prove that human did the act. If author had tried to show in which way the evidences were collected or what were that criteria's applied to reach to the conclusion then it might make more sense to omit humans as the cause of the extinctions but due to no support to the statement it fails to provide cogency to the argument.
Moreover, author mentions the discard of small fishes bones and states that no large bones were found hence conclude that it means humans are innocent in the case. Again it is possible that most of the bones from the mammals must be fragmented now. Also, the relation of the bones of fishes and mammals not clear enough to make such a claim. What author is trying say by relation is not concludable. If more points were included to make the relation more diaphanous and a better approach was used to reach the conclusion then it's possible to consider the claim.
Lastly, in last line author completely believes that climate or any other natural hazard caused extinction not humans is absurd. In such a large time period of time, nothing can be stated with 100 percent surety. And on what basis author is blaming nature for the cause is also not elaborated. It's completely absurd to say that by omitting rest cases nature is the culprit. More details are needed to make such a claim and author nowhere mention he ended up with the conclusion.
Though it might be possible that humans didn't hunt these animals and by some natural disaster extinction occurred, however, without any concrete facts or details nothing of those can be proved. The author claims everything with certainty but didn't put enough factual data to support his argument.
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct. Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species' extinctions, b 58
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 58
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 58
- "The desire of corporations to maximize profits creates conflict with the general welfare of the nation at large. " 70
- Argument Topic: "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ything without enough facts or evidence cant be put into certainty, be it humans hun...
^^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...he argument, its just stated that there wasnt much proof that could lead to prove tha...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... humans is absurd. In such a large time period of time, nothing can be stated with 100 percent...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 41, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...Though it might be possible that humans didnt hunt these animals and by some natural ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 174, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...ny concrete facts or details nothing of those can be proved. The author claims everything...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 243, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...or claims everything with certainty but didnt put enough factual data to support his ...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'lastly', 'moreover', 'so', 'then']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.24358974359 0.25644967241 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.185897435897 0.15541462614 120% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0747863247863 0.0836205057962 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0555555555556 0.0520304965353 107% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0299145299145 0.0272364105082 110% => OK
Prepositions: 0.104700854701 0.125424944231 83% => OK
Participles: 0.0448717948718 0.0416121511921 108% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.41085188119 2.79052419416 86% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0491452991453 0.026700313972 184% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00213675213675 0.001811407834 118% => OK
Determiners: 0.115384615385 0.113004496875 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.017094017094 0.0255425247493 67% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0149572649573 0.0127820249294 117% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2527.0 2731.13054187 93% => OK
No of words: 438.0 446.07635468 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76940639269 6.12365571057 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.57801047555 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.344748858447 0.378187486979 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.230593607306 0.287650121315 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.141552511416 0.208842608468 68% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0821917808219 0.135150697306 61% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41085188119 2.79052419416 86% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 207.018472906 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481735159817 0.469332199767 103% => OK
Word variations: 53.6344841838 52.1807786196 103% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.039408867 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0526315789 23.2022227129 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2446451406 57.7814097925 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 141.986410481 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0526315789 23.2022227129 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.578947368421 0.724660767414 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.58251231527 167% => OK
Readability: 46.1119923095 51.9672348444 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.44881889764 1.8405768891 79% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39960014847 0.441005458295 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.103859248028 0.135418324435 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.100628611358 0.0829849096947 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.524475752095 0.58762219726 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.185329693359 0.147661913831 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153890143281 0.193483328276 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120482485899 0.0970749176394 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.424732679427 0.42659136922 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.152656863966 0.0774707102158 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267608517502 0.312017818177 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12102363206 0.0698173142475 173% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.87684729064 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.82512315271 104% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 6.46551724138 62% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 5.36822660099 130% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 14.657635468 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.