In the preceding argument, the author states that when people arrived to Kaliko islands has caused large mammals to die within 3000 years from their arriving , the conclusion of the argument is based on the following explanations. Firstly, he states that people have used to hunt large mammals as a sources of food, then the researchers found fish's bones were discarded. Further, he claims that there is no evidence of using stone knives as a tool to hunt the large mammals. Hence, in the first glance it may seem plausible. However, careful scrutiny sheds light on plethora of explanations that could undermine the value of the argument.
To begin with, the author readily states that the main cause of large mammals extinction is people over hunting. On one hand, the reliable explanation is, even there is a positive and concrete relation between human arriving 7.000 ago and extinction of large mammals, this does not necessarily indicate a conspicuous relation between the two events. In deed, further illustration decrease the food sources could be the main cause of the sharp decline on mammals numbers due to strong competitions between human beings and animals that indicate scarcity of food sources. Or the second explanation the climate has changed and affected the vitality of mammals and it could be there is not any coping mechanisms to counter the situation.
Secondly, he claims that scientists has found fish's boons, this piece of fact could explain that people used to eat fish as main food and there is no evidence indicates extinction of fish. Moreover, he states a vague relation between extinction of mammals and availability of fish's bones. This could be a good explanation that human beings were not the cause of the extinction. But it could be a good sign that both of them have used to eat fish and with human beings were coming there was a competition led to mammals extinction. though, there is no evidence such as mammals bones indicates that people was the direct cause of mammals extinction.
Thirdly, he concluded that the researchers could not find sharps tools such as stone knives. Thus, the plausible explanation that they did not have the basic tools to hunt large animals. In deed, the author explanation is vague and requires further illustration. Additionally, the best explanation that people were not the cause of extinction because simply did not have the basic tools to do that.
In conclusion, the argument fails to mention one key factor. Namely, all the previous facts are equivocal. In sum, without complete information and explanations the argument is unsubstantiated and opened to debate.
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement."Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire, because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate. Another advantage is that housing costs 29
- tpo34 60
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the ext 83
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 58
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.0 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 436 350
No. of Characters: 2157 1500
No. of Different Words: 186 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.57 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.947 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.633 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 153 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 113 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 73 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.8 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.012 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.55 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.324 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.559 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.145 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ie within 3000 years from their arriving , the conclusion of the argument is based...
^^
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a source' or simply 'sources'?
Suggestion: a source; sources
...ople have used to hunt large mammals as a sources of food, then the researchers found fis...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mammals'' or 'mammal's'?
Suggestion: mammals'; mammal's
...ily states that the main cause of large mammals extinction is people over hunting. On o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mammals'' or 'mammal's'?
Suggestion: mammals'; mammal's
... the main cause of the sharp decline on mammals numbers due to strong competitions betw...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Though
... competition led to mammals extinction. though, there is no evidence such as mammals b...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey did not have the basic tools to hunt large animals. In deed, the author expla...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 55.5748502994 94% => OK
Nominalization: 31.0 16.3942115768 189% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2214.0 2260.96107784 98% => OK
No of words: 436.0 441.139720559 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07798165138 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72231782735 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 204.123752495 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461009174312 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 705.55239521 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.22255489022 213% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6910100105 57.8364921388 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.428571429 119.503703932 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7619047619 23.324526521 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61904761905 5.70786347227 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181995662052 0.218282227539 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493444674236 0.0743258471296 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510010370504 0.0701772020484 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915147662304 0.128457276422 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510098346229 0.0628817314937 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 98.500998004 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.