"Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places."
The statement contends that the law should not be rigid or fixed, rather it should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. It can be conceded that there should be proper considerations about the various aspects such as circumstances, times and places. As it supports the arbiter for the proper judgement making about the particular case and bring justice. Beyond this concession, however, the statement's contentions are indefensible from both empirical and normative standpoint.
Firstly the defination of the law clearly states about the uniformity and equality for all the members of the society, thus there is no flexibility about the law to be attained. Also suppose if there is an accident in which a pedestrion dies and the car driver was found to be drunk driving and was in a hurry to reach his home as his wife had a stroke half an hour before the accident, while he was having alcoholic beverages with his best friend at a bar. The cirmustances and situation suggests that the culprit should be exonerated as he was in an exigency, but then it is justifiable to the victim that died in the car accident. This account also explains that there can be numerous accounts as such and the law if would have been flexible the culprit walks freely.
Secondly the explaination about the circumstances and the case is to be done by the advocate or the lawyer of the respective sides for example take the case discussed above, if the car driver had not been drunk and yet if the accident takes place then the explaination of the circumstances had to be done by the lawyer so that the case ends up with the compensation and not with death penalty or imprisonment. Thus the law is obstinate here as well and it gives the judgement in its bounds. Otherwise if it had been flexible then the driver might be suffering with the death penalty instead but becaus eof its obstinity it gives the accurate judgement.
Also there can be considered a case where the robbers tries loot a house and in the fight one of the robbers gets killed by the house owner, here as according to the law the penalty for murder is punishment but then according to the provision it can be proved that he got killed in the self-defense and the house owner walks free, thus here the circumstance was taken into account. But the law here is also firm as a mountain; house owner walks free because he did not intentionally murdered the robber.
To sum it up the suggestion is indefensible that the law should be flexible but rather the information about circumstances, times, and places should correctly be put in front of the law and it give the right judgement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-10 | Raval Rushabh | 50 | view |
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to 50
- "It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation; the details may be worked out by a team, but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual." 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the president of Excello Food Markets."In 90 towns where Excello has food markets, natural-food stores specializing in organic food products — products containing no chemical preservatives and made with foods 50
- From a draft textbook manuscript submitted to a publisher."As Earth was being formed out of the collision of space rocks, the heat from those collisions and from the increasing gravitational energy of the planet made the entire planet molten, even the sur 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The statement contends that the law shou...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h empirical and normative standpoint. Firstly the defination of the law...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 728, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...umerous accounts as such and the law if would have been flexible the culprit walks freely. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n flexible the culprit walks freely. Secondly the explaination about the circ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...not with death penalty or imprisonment. Thus the law is obstinate here as well and i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...d it gives the judgement in its bounds. Otherwise if it had been flexible then the driver...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity it gives the accurate judgement. Also there can be considered a case wher...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...gives the accurate judgement. Also there can be considered a case where th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 491, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'did' requires base form of the verb: 'murder'
Suggestion: murder
...s free because he did not intentionally murdered the robber. To sum it up the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... intentionally murdered the robber. To sum it up the suggestion is indefensi...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 200, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gives'?
Suggestion: gives
...ectly be put in front of the law and it give the right judgement.
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230923694779 0.25644967241 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.16265060241 0.15541462614 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0602409638554 0.0836205057962 72% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0682730923695 0.0520304965353 131% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0381526104418 0.0272364105082 140% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.118473895582 0.125424944231 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0461847389558 0.0416121511921 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77411749553 2.79052419416 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0200803212851 0.026700313972 75% => OK
Particles: 0.00401606425703 0.001811407834 222% => OK
Determiners: 0.142570281124 0.113004496875 126% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0240963855422 0.0255425247493 94% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00602409638554 0.0127820249294 47% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2714.0 2731.13054187 99% => OK
No of words: 469.0 446.07635468 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7867803838 6.12365571057 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.57801047555 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.296375266525 0.378187486979 78% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.221748400853 0.287650121315 77% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.16631130064 0.208842608468 80% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.119402985075 0.135150697306 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77411749553 2.79052419416 99% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 207.018472906 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43710021322 0.469332199767 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.7213970927 52.1807786196 93% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.039408867 70% => OK
Sentence length: 33.5 23.2022227129 144% => OK
Sentence length SD: 96.7274732516 57.7814097925 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 193.857142857 141.986410481 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5 23.2022227129 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.07142857143 0.724660767414 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 3.58251231527 307% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 55.6748400853 51.9672348444 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.47014925373 1.8405768891 80% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188568819486 0.441005458295 43% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.189309726998 0.135418324435 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.104718705228 0.0829849096947 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.694660033952 0.58762219726 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.163776990695 0.147661913831 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125028896305 0.193483328276 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14537283143 0.0970749176394 150% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.532670469861 0.42659136922 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0659856661418 0.0774707102158 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17355024439 0.312017818177 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105007062775 0.0698173142475 150% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.33743842365 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.87684729064 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 6.46551724138 62% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 14.657635468 55% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.