The argument claims that since there is a small possibility that a person administered inoculations can die, the routine administration of these inoculations are not permitted. The following claim is based on a lot of specific evidence which needs to be evaluated before such a claim can be made.
First, we need concrete evidence that are there specific symptoms of cow flu which can be easily noticed or whether they need specific tests to aid the individual who can then seek help. If they can be easily be determined than the routine administration to all the people in the area can be minimised and so can the risk of death for people not affected by the cow flu. This can lead to the weakening of the argument. However, if it needs meticulous testing all people need to be checked and hence the death toll becomes a valid threat, which strengthens the argument.
Second, we need to look at the cause of the flu or whether it is communicable or not. If the cause of the disease can be eliminated or defined then the early quarantine of the area could be more easier as well as it will be helpful to only administer inoculations to people that are most likely to be affected and hence they can be monitored easily for any ill effect of these inoculations conversely to administering regular inoculations to a larger group. More evidence regarding the disease is needed.
Finally, there is no clear evidence regarding how small is the possibility of death by the administration of the inoculations. if the number of deaths is 1 in 100,000,000, then it may be a relatively small number but what if it is 2 deaths in 10 people who have been administered can be a fairly larger risk. Hence the vagueness of the word 'small' tends to weaken the assumption, more evidence needs to be specified regarding the death toll.
We need a lot of evidence regarding whether the disease can be successfully be identified based on the symptoms or whether the flu is communicable or not and can it be quarantined or whether the death toll of administering inoculations is as small as is being mentioned. Based on the lack of these necessary evidence it is not feasible to evaluate the claim made by the argument. Hence more, specific information is need to evaluate it better.
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 50
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned wit 90
- “Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot pe 83
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 49
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 398 350
No. of Characters: 1835 1500
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.467 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.611 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.906 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 115 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 89 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 70 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.429 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 16.948 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.386 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.614 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.16 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...e early quarantine of the area could be more easier as well as it will be helpful to only a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...antine of the area could be more easier as well as it will be helpful to only admi...
^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...the administration of the inoculations. if the number of deaths is 1 in 100,000,00...
^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ministered can be a fairly larger risk. Hence the vagueness of the word small tends t...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y be identified based on the symptoms or whether the flu is communicable or not a...
^^
Line 9, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able or not and can it be quarantined or whether the death toll of administering ...
^^
Line 9, column 383, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...valuate the claim made by the argument. Hence more, specific information is need to ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...de by the argument. Hence more, specific information is need to evaluate it bette...
^^
Line 9, column 440, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...fic information is need to evaluate it better.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, look, may, regarding, second, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.6327345309 183% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.9520958084 170% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 2260.96107784 83% => OK
No of words: 398.0 441.139720559 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71105527638 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95097373826 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 204.123752495 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.399497487437 0.468620217663 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 705.55239521 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.4479212177 57.8364921388 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 119.503703932 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5333333333 23.324526521 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 5.70786347227 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232983914218 0.218282227539 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875081152792 0.0743258471296 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735612344781 0.0701772020484 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153080902766 0.128457276422 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323978947184 0.0628817314937 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.3550499002 111% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.5979740519 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.32208582834 89% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 98.500998004 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.