"Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One graduate of the course was able to read a 500-page report in only two hours; another graduate rose from an assistant manager to vice president of the company in under a year. Obviously, the faster you can read, the more information you can absorb in a single workday. Moreover, Easy Read would cost Acme only $500 per employee—a small price to pay when you consider the benefits. Included in this fee is a three-week seminar in Spruce City and a lifelong subscription to the Easy Read newsletter. Clearly, Acme would benefit greatly by requiring all of our employees to take the Easy Read course."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
The argument makes a number of unsubstantiated assumptions regarding the benefit of Easy Read course. In general, careful examination of the supporting evidence revials that it lend little crdibly to support applicant’s claim. There remain some questions that need answering before ane steps can be taken.
The argument claims that after Easy Read course it will possible to read 500-page report in two hours. However, it is not clear how much information the employee will understand. For example, it might have been that the worker will understand nothing because of very fast reading. Unless, the author provides any information about how much information the worker will understand it could have been a mistake to buy this course for employeers.
Another unstated assumption is that because of the reding course the empoyee became the president of the company. Nevertheless, it is not clear other factors of this result. It could have been that the cause of this success became family relationship or the copmany is too small and the previous president lieve the company and as a result it becames possible to achieve this goalwithin year. Consequently, without other information about this case it might have been a mistake to buy this course.
In conclusion, the recommendation to buy Easy Read course is not well supported. To strenghten it the author has to provide additional information about the employee’s success and about the quality of this fast reading. Unless, this assumtion are addressed the argument will fall apart and it could have been a wrong decision to take Easy Read course.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | lan122333 | 34 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | Ramzah Rehman | 63 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | Pyralis | 29 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | Dhruv_gre | 39 | view |
| 2017-09-03 | davidarranow | 58 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview."It is time for the city of Grandview to stop funding the Grandview Symphony Orchestra. It is true that the symphony struggled financially for many years, but last year priva 54
- The right to bear arms is not the direct cause of the level of violence in a country 58
- "Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One graduate of the course was able to read a 500-page report in only two hours; another graduate rose from a 50
- The following memo appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council."An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby East M 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the marketing director of Top Dog Pet Stores."Five years ago, Fish Emporium started advertising in the magazine Exotic Pets Monthly. Their stores saw sales increase by 15 percent. The three Fish Emporium stores in Gul 50
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'however', 'nevertheless', 'regarding', 'so', 'well', 'as to', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'in general', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.255172413793 0.25644967241 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.162068965517 0.15541462614 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0862068965517 0.0836205057962 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0344827586207 0.0520304965353 66% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0379310344828 0.0272364105082 139% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.1 0.125424944231 80% => OK
Participles: 0.0379310344828 0.0416121511921 91% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90607148558 2.79052419416 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0310344827586 0.026700313972 116% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.127586206897 0.113004496875 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0379310344828 0.0255425247493 149% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0103448275862 0.0127820249294 81% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1613.0 2731.13054187 59% => OK
No of words: 260.0 446.07635468 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.20384615385 6.12365571057 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.57801047555 88% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.384615384615 0.378187486979 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.3 0.287650121315 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.192307692308 0.208842608468 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.123076923077 0.135150697306 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90607148558 2.79052419416 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 207.018472906 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.469332199767 108% => OK
Word variations: 48.3416027696 52.1807786196 93% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.039408867 70% => OK
Sentence length: 18.5714285714 23.2022227129 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6709038496 57.7814097925 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.214285714 141.986410481 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 23.2022227129 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.785714285714 0.724660767414 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.58251231527 0% => OK
Readability: 48.5714285714 51.9672348444 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.67647058824 1.8405768891 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326363907837 0.441005458295 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124375963293 0.135418324435 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0706252956219 0.0829849096947 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.574011205198 0.58762219726 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.122243080354 0.147661913831 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152296846797 0.193483328276 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906679328861 0.0970749176394 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.384400979719 0.42659136922 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.104730390761 0.0774707102158 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239029197525 0.312017818177 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326220012282 0.0698173142475 47% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.33743842365 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.87684729064 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.82512315271 62% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 6.46551724138 93% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 14.657635468 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.