“In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town, we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area. The Hillview landfill, which has been undeveloped for decades, is a perfect site for this plant. The building and staffing of this plant will put to work thousands of Hillview residents left unemployed after Computech computer software programming company abandoned its national facility last year. I am asking the City Council to authorize a large campaign to attract the company and offer significant tax incentives to make our town attractive to this giant of car manufacturing.”
The argument provided makes some unwarranted assumptions in order to reach the conclusion that AutoTech's automobile manufacturing plant is set up in Hillview, it will solve all the unemployment issues faced by the city. The argument fails to provide any reliable justification for its tall claim and fails to provide other relevant details required.
First, the argument assumes that the Hillview landfill will be perfect for the automobile manufacturing plant. There are no details provided as to why it has been abandoned and left undeveloped for decades. It could have been used for anything, it might be that the land is unsuitable for building anything, it might be harmful due to the runoff from factories or any other type of toxic waste materials which might have made it unusable. In this case, why would the company be willing to risk their project by building a plant on a land that might be harmful to humans, and might thwart their attempts to construct and run the plant, thus leading to a waste of resources and manpower.
Second, the Mayor deems the plant to be a solution to the rampant unemployment in the town. The argument posits that the people left jobless when the Computech computer software programming company abandoned its facility, would get a job at the plant. The same type of skills cannot be expected from a person working at a software company, and the one working in an automobile manufacturing plant. You can't expect a writer to do the job of an architecture without going through all the training and certification that is required. So, how is it concluded that the plant will recruit all the unemployed people, even the ones that have no relevant experience in the field or the required skills.
Finally, the argument fails to specify if the unemployed people might be willing to work at the plant or not. It assumes that the plan might be the only source of jobs in Hillview, it doesn’t explicitly say that there are lack of jobs in the city. Also, the pay-scale at the plant might not be that high, leading to people looking for jobs elsewhere, where higher pay is being offered. It doesn't talk about the economic situation of the city, how is it faring financially. People might be unemployed of their own accord, not willing to work. Thus the argument has some yawning gaps to fill before making an assessment.
All things considered, because of the lack of credible evidence in its favour, we cannot render the argument fully reasonable. The assumptions that the manufacturing plan will solve the unemployment issues of the city, and Autotech will be interested in building a plant are baseless. The reasoning provided for the claim is ambiguous, leading to a fallacious argument with numerous logical flaws.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-12 | Technoblade | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-02 | Payal_2610 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | keisham | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | aiswaryae | 55 | view |
| 2022-11-22 | Rasika0511 | 57 | view |
- In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area The Hillview landfill which has been undeveloped for decades is a perfect site for this plant The build 66
- If we want to save money on municipal garbage disposal fees we need to encourage our residents to recycle more Late last year our neighboring town Hayesworth passed a law requiring that all households recycle paper and glass or pay a fine Since that time 73
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society especially among children Others believe that children s peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children s beh 58
- claim The emergence of the online blogosphere and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States Reason When anyone can publish political opinions easily standards for covering news and political topics wil 66
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... an automobile manufacturing plant. You cant expect a writer to do the job of an arc...
^^^^
Line 4, column 389, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
..., where higher pay is being offered. It doesnt talk about the economic situation of th...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 542, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... their own accord, not willing to work. Thus the argument has some yawning gaps to f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, look, may, second, so, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.6327345309 127% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.9520958084 147% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2290.0 2260.96107784 101% => OK
No of words: 467.0 441.139720559 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90364025696 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7473892652 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 204.123752495 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460385438972 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 705.55239521 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1263701104 57.8364921388 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 119.503703932 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.35 23.324526521 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.70786347227 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 6.88822355289 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238076112452 0.218282227539 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791617908487 0.0743258471296 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644900172486 0.0701772020484 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143506531664 0.128457276422 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504991019919 0.0628817314937 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.3550499002 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 98.500998004 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... an automobile manufacturing plant. You cant expect a writer to do the job of an arc...
^^^^
Line 4, column 389, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
..., where higher pay is being offered. It doesnt talk about the economic situation of th...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 542, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... their own accord, not willing to work. Thus the argument has some yawning gaps to f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, look, may, second, so, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.6327345309 127% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.9520958084 147% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2290.0 2260.96107784 101% => OK
No of words: 467.0 441.139720559 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90364025696 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7473892652 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 204.123752495 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460385438972 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 705.55239521 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1263701104 57.8364921388 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 119.503703932 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.35 23.324526521 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.70786347227 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 6.88822355289 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238076112452 0.218282227539 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791617908487 0.0743258471296 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644900172486 0.0701772020484 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143506531664 0.128457276422 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504991019919 0.0628817314937 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.3550499002 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 98.500998004 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.