"In order to save a considerable amount of money, Rockingham's century-old town hall should be torn down and replaced by the larger and more energy-efficient building that some citizens have proposed. The old town hall is too small to comfortably accommod

Essay topics:

"In order to save a considerable amount of money, Rockingham's century-old town hall should be torn down and replaced by the larger and more energy-efficient building that some citizens have proposed. The old town hall is too small to comfortably accommodate the number of people who are employed by the town. In addition, it is very costly to heat the old hall in winter and cool it in summer. The new, larger building would be more energy efficient, costing less per square foot to heat and cool than the old hall. Furthermore, it would be possible to rent out some of the space in the new building, thereby generating income for the town of Rockingham."

In this argument, the author of the editorial states that a century-old town hall should be torn down and replaced by a larger, more energy-efficient building. As reasons for the destruction of the old building, the author states that it is too small for the number of town employees, and that it is very costly to heat during the winter and cool during the summer. Finally, the author states that the town could receive income from the new building by renting out some space in the newly constructed building. This argument fails because it is based on mere speculation and opinion and a "zero-sum" ...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Votes
Average: 10 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-30 samruddh_shah 83 view
2019-12-22 no one 55 view
2019-09-09 pb24 33 view
2019-07-22 tanayagar 83 view
2019-07-12 MallikaS 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user GREpro :

Comments

argument 1 -- OK

argument 2 -- OK

argument 3 -- OK

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 6
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 596 350
No. of Characters: 2978 1500
No. of Different Words: 240 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.941 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.997 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.857 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 220 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 173 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 127 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 65 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.091 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.335 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.545 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.386 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.546 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.146 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5