The author concludes that in order to attract more viewers they should restore the weather and local news program to its former level. To justify this conslusion the author reasons that the business holders canceled their contracts and also they recieved complaints from the viewers which were concerend with weather and local news program. The argument fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated. however, scrutiny of the evidence reveals that it provides little credible support for the authors conslusion. Hence, the argument is incomplete or unsubstantiated and has several flaws.
First, The argument readily assumes that the complaints which they have recieved shows that the viewers wants the former programs about weather and news this is merely an assumption made without much solid ground. For example, they author does not mentioned the number of these complaints, and the desire they have about these programs, maybe they are complaining about the truth of the news and weather forcasts. Hence, the argument would have been much more convicing if it explixitly states the detais and statics of the complains and shows that wich percent of the complaints are about restoring the news and weather program.
The author also claims that the local businesses canceled their advertisment contracts with them. This again is a weak and unsupported claim as it does not demonstrate any correlation between the viewers and these cancellations. To illustrate further, the business could cancel their contracts because of the prices, or maybe they have changed their selling strategies and they are not selling their products on a specific region any more. If the argument had provided evidence wich shows that these cancelation are due to declination of the viewers then it would be much more convincing to the reader.
Finally, the author notes that for attracting more people and increasing their viewers to avoid losing advertising revenues, they should devote more time to weather and local news programs. In contrast, scrutiny of the author's claim reveals that it could be consider in other ways too. For instance, they can add other attractive and etertaining programs,such as competitions, sports etc. The reader is left with impression that the claims made by the author are more wishful rather than substantice evidence.
In conclusion, the author's argument is unpersuasive as it stands.To bolster it further, the author must provide more concrete evidence, perhaps by way of a reliable survet of the viewers opinion and desires. Ultimately, to better evaluate the argument, it would be necessary to know more information about why the viewers are declined and how to attract the new and ore viewers.
- "The surface of a section of Route 101, paved just two years ago by Good Intentions Roadways, is now badly cracked with a number of dangerous potholes. In another part of the state, a section of Route 40, paved by Appian Roadways more than four years ago, 75
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 80
- "The surface of a section of Route 101, paved just two years ago by Good Intentions Roadways, is now badly cracked with a number of dangerous potholes. In another part of the state, a section of Route 40, paved by Appian Roadways more than four years ago, 75
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ 50
- Tpo 9 (integrated) 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 438, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...e basis of which it could be evaluated. however, scrutiny of the evidence reveals that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mention'
Suggestion: mention
...ound. For example, they author does not mentioned the number of these complaints, and the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...products on a specific region any more. If the argument had provided evidence wich...
^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this cancelation' or 'these cancelations'?
Suggestion: this cancelation; these cancelations
...t had provided evidence wich shows that these cancelation are due to declination of the viewers t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 354, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , such
...ther attractive and etertaining programs,such as competitions, sports etc. The reader...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...bstantice evidence. In conclusion, the authors argument is unpersuasive as it stands.T...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...s argument is unpersuasive as it stands.To bolster it further, the author must pro...
^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'viewers'' or 'viewer's'?
Suggestion: viewers'; viewer's
...haps by way of a reliable survet of the viewers opinion and desires. Ultimately, to bet...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 11.1786427146 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 28.8173652695 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 55.5748502994 77% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2314.0 2260.96107784 102% => OK
No of words: 440.0 441.139720559 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25909090909 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67414541845 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 204.123752495 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 705.55239521 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5537757111 57.8364921388 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.555555556 119.503703932 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 23.324526521 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.70786347227 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1712190665 0.218282227539 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588428740768 0.0743258471296 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072150104263 0.0701772020484 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101253395116 0.128457276422 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050544334014 0.0628817314937 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.3799401198 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.5979740519 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 98.500998004 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.