Pirouettes Ballet School is the clear choice for any child. Of all the dance schools in Elmtown, Pirouettes has the most intensive program, and our teachers have danced in the most prestigious ballet companies all over the world. Many of our students have gone on to become professional dancers with top dance companies.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
In order for the author's statement to be properly evaluated, we must locate several different assumptions on which the argument is based. Then, we can evaluate these assumptions and decide if they are in fact reasonable.
While the Pirouettes Ballet School may be a beneficial choice for some children, other children may require a different type of school. For example, if a child cares deeply about having fun and does not like to compete then an intensive program like the Pirouettes may not be the best fit for the child.
Also, the Pirouettes' member that wrote the recommendation saying it is the most intensive program is unreasonable and near impossible to justify. In order to prove that Pirouettes is the most intensive program, Pirouettes' member must have tried every other program in the entire world. If the author accomplished this unreasonable task then we would be able to evaluate this part of the recommendation as a fact. And, if the statement is merely an opinion it must be taken with hesitation because the author is biased for being in the Pirouettes Ballet School.
While many of the Pirouettes' dancers may have become professional dancers at top companies, we do not know how many students have accomplished this feat nor do we know if the students obtained the role as a result of their experiences in the Pirouettes Ballet School. In order to properly evaluate this argument both of these unknowns must be discovered. For example, if only five percent of the Pirouettes dancers have become professional dancers at top companies, then the argument is no longer as impressive as what it seems to suggest. The argument states many of the students to give off an impression that a significant amount of students accomplished the feat however, the word many can be justifiable if five percent of the total dancers is three hundred children. So, even though each child is highly unlikely to become a professional dancer at a top company, the argument is still justified but requires an evaluation.
In order to evaluate if the children obtained the role because of the Pirouettes Ballet School, we must survey the members of the top companies. In these comprehensive surveys, we will pinpoint the reasons behind the hiring of the dancers. We will also survey the dancers to see if they learned the skills in the Pirouettes Ballet school that helped them gain the role in the top company. If the top companies state that the dancer's background from Pirouettes helped them gain the role in their company and the dancers say they learned their skills in Pirouettes then the final sentence of the argument can be validated.
In conclusion, many assumptions must be tested in order for the argument be properly evaluated. If the Pirouettes Ballet School is proven to be fit for any child, shown to be the most intensive program and lastly the Pirouettes' dancers at top companies gained the role because of the Pirouettes Ballet School then the argument will be properly justified. However, if these assumptions are proven false then the argument therefore will be false.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-28 | Naruto Uzumaki | 66 | view |
- Pirouettes Ballet School is the clear choice for any child. Of all the dance schools in Elmtown, Pirouettes has the most intensive program, and our teachers have danced in the most prestigious ballet companies all over the world. Many of our students have 66
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 66
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely align 58
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
In order for the authors statement to be properly evaluated, we ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...o be properly evaluated, we must locate several different assumptions on which the argument is ba...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...argument is based. Then, we can evaluate these assumptions and decide if they are...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, may, so, still, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 55.5748502994 99% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2582.0 2260.96107784 114% => OK
No of words: 519.0 441.139720559 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97495183044 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.56307096286 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79860333117 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 204.123752495 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.387283236994 0.468620217663 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 802.8 705.55239521 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 2.70958083832 369% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5654652688 57.8364921388 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.1 119.503703932 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.95 23.324526521 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.70786347227 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270509066232 0.218282227539 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963840964278 0.0743258471296 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898891053102 0.0701772020484 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160648604777 0.128457276422 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762462328503 0.0628817314937 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.3799401198 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.32208582834 89% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 98.500998004 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.