A recent study rating 100 college football players showed a strong relationship between their average number of colds caught per year and their teams’ records. Of the players studied, those who had the fewest colds had teams with win/loss ratios that were, on average, 50% higher than teams with players that caught more colds. These results suggest that if a college football team wants to win, it should recruit players that catch a lower number of colds per year than their peers.
As describe above one can’t judge one sided over the performance of football player. Colds caught per year are not only measure to judge the players statistics there are many ways to sort out the performance ability of player. Those who are healthy and have better immunity over health issues but were poor in performance. So it not necessary to judge or claim any argue on the basis of cold caught or not per year as describe in above argument.
We can’t conclude the performance of a football player over the colds caught per year.
As their mighty more cold weather than average of past 10 years in a country. So players get easily caught to cold due to cooled weather and their daily routine practice of football. Those who have done more practice in ground get easily sick, so it doesn’t conclude that their performance capability is low than average players. Players having low grip over a football but have better health or resistance over a cold weather their average goes higher than that of others.
If the division of players are done according to their performance capability one can’t get proper coaching and guidelines due to lack of faculty. So it hampers the overall result. Performance capability of particular student can’t achieve due to lack of resources to get resistance over a cold or ignorance of woollen cloth over a particular cold weather that might push them to have more cold over a certain sports year.
However, if proper coach are not available college team can’t get proper result for winning a football match. Thus it’s not necessary to predict the performance capability of any player in a college. If one want to win match than proper guidance of football match should be given on field as well as off field.
So particularly proper arrangement of coach as well as certain amenity should be provided by college administrative rather than not to claim any false prediction over a performance capability of student in football match rather than counting their colds caught per year
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 58
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 58
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 58
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 58
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 346 350
No. of Characters: 1653 1500
No. of Different Words: 148 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.313 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.777 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.549 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 122 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 83 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 50 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.625 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.13 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.688 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.38 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.64 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.105 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'players'' or 'player's'?
Suggestion: players'; player's
... year are not only measure to judge the players statistics there are many ways to sort ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...layer over the colds caught per year. As their mighty more cold weather than ave...
^^
Line 15, column 117, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...er result for winning a football match. Thus it's not necessary to predict the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 55.5748502994 94% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 2260.96107784 77% => OK
No of words: 345.0 441.139720559 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0231884058 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68885538645 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 204.123752495 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434782608696 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 705.55239521 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6247288497 57.8364921388 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.3125 119.503703932 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 23.324526521 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.70786347227 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285071343536 0.218282227539 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115907360015 0.0743258471296 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646098098502 0.0701772020484 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179232633611 0.128457276422 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618041022825 0.0628817314937 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.32208582834 86% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 98.500998004 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.