a nation should require all of its student
Nation wealth is its future generation. So its become fundamental duty of nation's administrator to provide better level of education to precious gem of nation. Better curriculum means better position of students in this competitive global world. Every childeren has different sharp minds. In order to give justice to inteligence and creativity of every child there should not be same curriculum until they enter the college of thier decided program.
Every creative mind sooths in different fields of innovation. It's duty of administrative panel to take care wheather student are go through thier intrested program in school rather than going through mundane national curriculum. There should be better level of selection process of subject in school. Figuring out same national curriculum among the whole nation is none other than being dogmatic administration.
There should be specific deparment for the innovations in the field of education and also imparting new and futuristic level of education among the pupils of nation making more strenghtful than ever. By providing different curriculum student has chance and offcourse opportunity to make nation great. Involving different criteria of subjects among the nation curriculum enhances the mental and creativity goal of student in particular sector of it's interest making a nation the hub of innovation.
Eventually making the whole curriculum same among the nation generates high amount of disinterest among the naive's mind of student engender the acme of illiteracy rate. So it's in interest of nation not to provide same kind of curriculum rather than facing various economic calamities like high illiteracy rate, lessen in skilled labour, confounding unemployement rate moderately weaking nation's overall growth and virtue among the global countries.
Thus, its favour in the mandate of nation pupils and future generation of nation to provide a facility of selection of thier desired course criteria and all that stuff.So it's make nation suitable for better living standard of life among its pupil
- Scholastic art and music programs are so important that the government should fund those programs in schools that cannot afford them. 50
- All cities should devote at least five percent of their budgets to programs that preserve and protect existing parks 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 58
- All cities should devote at least five percent of their budgets to programs that preserve and protect existing parks
- Some peopre beft eve lhey should keep oll the money they hove eorned ond should nol poy lox lo lhe sfofe Do you ogree or disogree 21
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...panel to take care wheather student are go through thier intrested program in scho...
^^
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent in particular sector of its interest making a nation the hub of innovation. ...
^^
Line 9, column 169, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...ired course criteria and all that stuff.So its make nation suitable for better liv...
^^
Line 9, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... living standard of life among its pupil
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, thus, in particular, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 317.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53312302839 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79203157162 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529968454259 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9811868659 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.933333333 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34301916156 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121714289503 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780848585044 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215461907482 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472358129672 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.