A recent study shows that people living on the continent of North America suffer 9 times more chronic fatigue and 31 times more chronic depression than do people living on the continent of Asia. Interestingly, Asians, on average, eat 20 grams of soy per day, whereas North Americans eat virtually none. It turns out that soy contains phytochemicals called Isoflavones, which have been found to possess disease-preventing properties. Thus, North Americans should consider eating soy on a regular basis as a way of preventing fatigue and depression.
The author of this argument propose to increase the consumption of soy among North Americans in order to develope resistance against chronic fatigue and depression. The author have naively reached to the conclusion and there may be hidden factors affecting the population in North America.
Citing the study, the author reports more susceptibility of people in North America to fatigue and depression than people in Asia. However, the validity and scope of the study is ambiguous. For example, number of people on which the study has been done? what were the main criteria and symptoms on which the study has been done? Was the study has been conducted by certified officials? We just do not know. Unless the study is fully representative and viable author can not shield the argument on its basis.
Moving on to the point, photochemical present in soy which contains disease-preventing properties. However, disease is a wider word and do not contain only chronic fatigue and depression. Moreover, fatigue and depression are results of high profile life and are caused by hectic work environment. The weather, working conditions and lifestyle in Asia and North America are very different from each other. Therefore, it is very important to analyse all the factors affecting fatigue and depression rather than directly concluding the consuption of soy will have a positive effect.
According to the author, soy foods contain a chemical called Isoflavones, which have disease preventing properties. However, there is no study, which reveals that it is relevant for all types of diseases. Hence, a research has to be done to establish that the drugs used to treat these two diseases contain Isoflavones. However, it is a known fact that soy foods are good for human health as soy foods contain many nutrients required for the human body. Again, there is no solid evidence that eating soy foods on a regular basis is a solution for chronic fatigue and depression. The author has not even mentioned about any side effects of Isoflavones. Hence, the suggestion to take soy foods daily, without any detailed study about soy food, does not hold any ground.
Hence, it can be said that one should take soy foods for overall health. It is a possibility that soy foods can be helpful in treating or preventing some diseases, which further have chronic fatigue or depression as its symptoms. That way one can link these two diseases with Isoflavones. However, there is no direct relation between soy proteins and chronic fatigue and depression; it is not justified in the given argument. The author should have provided a few proofs and data to establish this relationship.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-17 | NSona | 60 | view |
| 2020-08-28 | Shreyan36 | 53 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | ko_tik | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | vijaykaushik132 | 63 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | Shahrear59 | 40 | view |
- High-profile awards such as the Nobel Prize are actually damaging to society because they suggest that only a few people deserve such recognition. 63
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a company that builds shopping malls throughout the country."The surface of a section of Route 101, paved two years ago by McAdam Road Builders, is now badly cracked and marred by dangerous 16
- Seven years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community's yards should be landscaped and what colors the exteriors of homes should be painted. Since then, average property values have tripled in B 42
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 63
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 439 350
No. of Characters: 2171 1500
No. of Different Words: 201 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.577 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.945 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.663 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 155 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 125 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 48 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.56 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.818 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.48 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.304 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.503 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.1 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...eople on which the study has been done? what were the main criteria and symptoms on ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...evant for all types of diseases. Hence, a research has to be done to establish that the dr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.6327345309 127% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 11.1786427146 170% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2239.0 2260.96107784 99% => OK
No of words: 439.0 441.139720559 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10022779043 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77340441399 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 204.123752495 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480637813212 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 705.55239521 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 19.7664670659 132% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0867626405 57.8364921388 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1153846154 119.503703932 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8846153846 23.324526521 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.61538461538 5.70786347227 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.67664670659 235% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193796242933 0.218282227539 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563892463149 0.0743258471296 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617324266831 0.0701772020484 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118288306506 0.128457276422 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452586339305 0.0628817314937 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.3799401198 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 98.500998004 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.