“ In the six mont hs that I have been watching the employees, their product ivity
has increased by over 12 percent . Therefore, my recommendaton is that the
employees either be watched by, or think that they are watched by, an outside
evaluat or at all times from this point on.”
The argument makes a number of unbubstaniated assumptions regarding the conclusion that the productivity of employees incresed bacause of they were watched. In general, careful examination of this supporting evidence releals that it lends little credible support to these applicants’ claims. There remains some questions that need answering before make any conclusions.
The argument assumes that the productivity of employees incresed bacause of they were wached. However, there is no other informationt about their work and their conditions. It could have been that the numbers of empoyeers was increased and, as a result, the productivity in the whole increased too. Moreover, it might have happened that the salary was increased and, consequently, the empoyeers became to work harder. Unless the author provide this information this assumption can not be reliable.
Besides this, the author claimes that the productivity has increased, however there is no information how the authoir evalueted their productivity. For instance, these workers could been accountants. It is not clear how to caunt their productivity. Without this information in could be a mistake to conclude that cause of the increse of productivity was the empoyeers were watched.
In conclusion, the conclusion about the cause of increase of productivity is not well supported. To strengthen it the author has to provide evedence about other factors that could have been influence the increase. Besides, the author muast also provide the method of evaluation of the increse. Unless this assumptions are addressed the argument fall apart and it might be a mistake to conclude that the productivity of employees incresed bacause of they were watched.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-10-10 | kovalana90 | 50 | view |
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. 50
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them. 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the marketing director of Top Dog Pet Stores."Five years ago, Fish Emporium started advertising in the magazine Exotic Pets Monthly. Their stores saw sales increase by 15 percent. The three Fish Emporium stores in Gul 50
- "Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One graduate of the course was able to read a 500-page report in only two hours; another graduate rose from a 50
- The right to bear arms is not the direct cause of the level of violence in a country 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 418, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Unless” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y, the empoyeers became to work harder. Unless the author provide this information thi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esides this, the author claimes that the productivity has increased, however ther...
^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have been' or 'be'?
Suggestion: have been; be
...vity. For instance, these workers could been accountants. It is not clear how to cau...
^^^^
Line 4, column 301, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...od of evaluation of the increse. Unless this assumptions are addressed the argument ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'consequently', 'however', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'as to', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in general', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233898305085 0.25644967241 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.196610169492 0.15541462614 127% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0338983050847 0.0836205057962 41% => Some adjectives wanted.
Adverbs: 0.0372881355932 0.0520304965353 72% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0440677966102 0.0272364105082 162% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.125423728814 0.125424944231 100% => OK
Participles: 0.064406779661 0.0416121511921 155% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.10413604455 2.79052419416 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0237288135593 0.026700313972 89% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.142372881356 0.113004496875 126% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0237288135593 0.0255425247493 93% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0135593220339 0.0127820249294 106% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1728.0 2731.13054187 63% => OK
No of words: 264.0 446.07635468 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.54545454545 6.12365571057 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.57801047555 88% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.409090909091 0.378187486979 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.363636363636 0.287650121315 126% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.265151515152 0.208842608468 127% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.189393939394 0.135150697306 140% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10413604455 2.79052419416 111% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 207.018472906 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473484848485 0.469332199767 101% => OK
Word variations: 44.3155833984 52.1807786196 85% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.039408867 80% => OK
Sentence length: 16.5 23.2022227129 71% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3350295858 57.7814097925 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 141.986410481 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 23.2022227129 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 0.724660767414 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 52.8636363636 51.9672348444 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.5243902439 1.8405768891 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267541265251 0.441005458295 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.117183479623 0.135418324435 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.120072321215 0.0829849096947 145% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.53246101573 0.58762219726 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.162651829134 0.147661913831 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121695288024 0.193483328276 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597229699891 0.0970749176394 62% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.492027191121 0.42659136922 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0821990051217 0.0774707102158 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213703868534 0.312017818177 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218434536033 0.0698173142475 31% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.33743842365 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.87684729064 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 6.46551724138 62% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 5.36822660099 112% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.82389162562 142% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 14.657635468 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.