super screen movie production company
Resource allocation to marketing is recognized as an effective way to increase consumer adeption to services, but other forms of investment might need to be considered before a final decision regarding the past year attendance of Super Screen productions.
The solely fact that reviewers engage in postive remarks regarding the movies does not contemplate other points associated with a thoughrough analysis of the insufficient revenue. The favorable comments could be associated with a niche of the market more identified with the genre of movies produced by Super Screen, which might obliterate the recognition of flaws in the process that leads to the decision about the titles that will be available for viewers next year.
Perhaps a survey among prospective consumers would proove relevant prior to the increase in advertisement share in next year's budget. This approach could identify a need for different genres, valuable actors, date of launch any many other variables that will potentially pave the way to a recovery in sales, making the company's endeavour more prosperous than recent numbers depict.
Certain styels of movies are found to reach a saturation in public acceptance in different moments, reflecting changes of patterns in personal disposition to attend theathers, deppending on what is currently happening in society. One last factor that may be worth of analysis is the astounding growth of streaming. This element alone can possibly modify the channels of distribution of the films, using technology in favor of the company's targets in sales for next year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | Mahima1902 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | Eurus Psycho Version | 55 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | riyarmy | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-14 | Saket Choudhary | 68 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 58 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 335, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...growth of streaming. This element alone can possibly modify the channels of distribution of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 11.1786427146 9% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 28.8173652695 24% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 55.5748502994 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 2260.96107784 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 248.0 441.139720559 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43951612903 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88041836607 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 204.123752495 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.641129032258 0.468620217663 137% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 705.55239521 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 19.7664670659 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.8473053892 136% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.4807939399 57.8364921388 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.625 119.503703932 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 23.324526521 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.70786347227 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 6.88822355289 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162266278794 0.218282227539 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552124394408 0.0743258471296 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426206387717 0.0701772020484 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860310379377 0.128457276422 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378331187724 0.0628817314937 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 14.3799401198 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 48.3550499002 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.197005988 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.5979740519 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.32208582834 127% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 98.500998004 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 12.3882235529 165% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.1389221557 129% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.