SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's current headquarters. Moreover, Middleburg is a predominately urban area and according to an employee survey, SuperCorp has determined that its workers prefer to live in an area that is not urban. Finally, Corporateville has lower taxes than Middlesburg, making it not only a safer place to work but also a cheaper one. Therefore, Supercorp clearly made the best decision.
The author's statement has many points which are left unanswered due to which the statement is not validated.
Firstly, it is impartial of the homeowners of Coporateville to say that Corporateville is superior place to live in just by the fact that SuperCorp has moved its headqurters in their place. Superior place to live is a relative term and cannot be defined by any corporate headquaters there.
Secondly, there is an understatement which mentions that Middleburg is an urban area, what states that it is an urban area is the question and place being an urban area else too, it is totally baised to say that members of SuperCorp are not willing to work in an urban area. Working should not be defined by location. It is being fastidious of employess in SuperCorp to make a wish and moving their headquaters on their one wish. We can say by this staement that if employees of SuperCorp are finding Corporateville urban then after few years they might want to move to anither city for it to be more developed than Corporateville. We cannot rely just on employee survey.
Moreover, in the statement it clearly mentions that by only one employee it is doing the survey and making the whole decision about moving haedquarters. It is imperitive to justify rationally.
Lastly it mentions in the statement that there are lower taxes in Corporateville, which makes that city or place cheaper so how is one able to call this a best decision to move its headquaters. Furthermore, there is no mention of reason for making Corporateville a safer place to live in just because there are lower taxes than Middleburg. A safer place obviates looting and burglary, people should be satiable where they live in, which has no mention. The statement has many loopholes that need to filled. Thus, this satement is not validated.
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. 50
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
The authors statement has many points which are lef...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 154, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...cheaper so how is one able to call this a best decision to move its headquaters. ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 2260.96107784 67% => OK
No of words: 311.0 441.139720559 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86816720257 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90611565743 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 204.123752495 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485530546624 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 705.55239521 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.471057884232 212% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.9178565652 57.8364921388 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.933333333 119.503703932 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 23.324526521 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 5.70786347227 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19764825971 0.218282227539 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636499673209 0.0743258471296 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805098554244 0.0701772020484 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108201107448 0.128457276422 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924771428336 0.0628817314937 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.5979740519 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 98.500998004 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.