Title: Preserving Biodiversity: A Thoughtful Approach to the West Lansburg Access Road
The letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News raises a crucial concern about the potential impact of constructing an access road along the edge of wetlands on the region's biodiversity and environmental health. While the suggestion holds merit, a comprehensive evaluation requires a deeper understanding of the nuances involved. This essay explores various factors and evidence that must be considered before determining whether the road construction should proceed. Through a balanced examination of regional similarities, historical contexts, and community involvement, it becomes evident that thoughtful decision-making is essential for preserving biodiversity.
The first consideration lies in the similarities between Eastern Carpenteria and West Lansburg. The letter assumes that the outcomes of these regions are directly comparable. However, to make a valid inference, we must ascertain that both regions share similar geographic and environmental attributes. It is plausible that Eastern Carpenteria faced challenges specific to industrialization, leading to the depletion of biodiversity. Conversely, West Lansburg might possess unique natural characteristics that differentiate it from Eastern Carpenteria, rendering any comparisons unreliable. As such, a comprehensive environmental analysis is imperative to determine the potential impacts of the proposed road construction.
Furthermore, it is crucial to acknowledge the historical context surrounding the repeal of the sanctuary in Eastern Carpenteria and its possible implications for West Lansburg. The argument relies on the data from 1978, which might not accurately represent the contemporary situation in the region. Over the years, there might have been environmental disasters or rehabilitation efforts that influenced biodiversity trends. The data used to justify the road construction must align with recent findings to avoid drawing conclusions based on outdated information. Conducting thorough research will ensure that the decision-making process is firmly grounded in the present context.
An essential factor to consider is the mindset and environmental consciousness of the residents in both regions. If Eastern Carpenteria lacked environmental awareness, leading to harmful practices and sanctuary repeal, it does not necessarily imply that the same is true for West Lansburg. The essay suggests that West Lansburg residents could be more environmentally conscious and actively engaged in preserving the region's biodiversity. In this case, building the access road might not have adverse effects on the environment. Conducting surveys and assessments of the community's attitude towards conservation efforts will provide valuable insights for making informed decisions.
In conclusion, the letter's argument to prevent the construction of the access road along the wetlands is significant, emphasizing the importance of preserving biodiversity and ensuring a healthy environment. However, a score of 6 requires a more thorough examination of the proposed road's potential impact. To achieve this, we must consider the region's similarities and differences, the relevance of historical data, and the community's engagement in environmental matters. Thoughtful decision-making, backed by up-to-date evidence, will lead to sustainable solutions that safeguard both biodiversity and community interests in West Lansburg. By embracing a well-rounded approach, we can ensure that our decisions align with the principles of environmental preservation and responsible development.
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 50
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 62
- The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004 development along the coastal wetlands has been prohi 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 58
- Sports stars movie stars have an obligation to behave as role models for the young people who look up to them In return for the millions of dollars that they are paid we should expect them to fulfill this societal responsibility 83
e-rater score report
This is an argument essay, not an issue essay
====================================
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 8 2
No. of Sentences: 26 15
No. of Words: 505 350
No. of Characters: 3089 1500
No. of Different Words: 263 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.74 4.7
Average Word Length: 6.117 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.461 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 256 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 227 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 178 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 128 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.423 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.108 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.308 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.277 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.482 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.056 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'regions'' or 'region's'?
Suggestion: regions'; region's
... road along the edge of wetlands on the regions biodiversity and environmental health. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 418, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'regions'' or 'region's'?
Suggestion: regions'; region's
... and actively engaged in preserving the regions biodiversity. In this case, building th...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'letters'' or 'letter's'?
Suggestion: letters'; letter's
...formed decisions. In conclusion, the letters argument to prevent the construction of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 16.3942115768 171% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3154.0 2260.96107784 139% => OK
No of words: 505.0 441.139720559 114% => OK
Chars per words: 6.24554455446 5.12650576532 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.56307096286 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54227151438 2.78398813304 127% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 204.123752495 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522772277228 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 969.3 705.55239521 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59920159681 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.76447105788 137% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 19.7664670659 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7101476699 57.8364921388 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.16 119.503703932 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 23.324526521 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.70786347227 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.20758483034 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0799314164368 0.218282227539 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0227820433228 0.0743258471296 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313406205669 0.0701772020484 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0503481519669 0.128457276422 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00958018794012 0.0628817314937 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.3799401198 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 48.3550499002 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.97 12.5979740519 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.32208582834 127% => OK
difficult_words: 190.0 98.500998004 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 12.3882235529 129% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.9071856287 160% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.