viewers
The author concludes that they lose their viewers since late-night news is allocated more time to national news and less time to weather and local news. thus to attract the viewers they turn over the time devoted to local news and weather to its previous level. This argument as it now stands may seem logical, however, it is unconvincing because the conclusion relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence and it contends some terms that lack definition, to the extent, it is hard to understand it.
First, the writer presupposes that just more time devoted to national news causes viewers to do not see this program. This argument does not contain any other variables reasons to loss the viewers such as the time of the program that it may have an effect on this problem since their viewers may sleep earlier at night or they have do not use the strong and professional program presentation. Furthermore, maybe the person who presents the news does not have explicit expressions.
Second, The statement contends that local businesses cancel their contract with them because of this issue. However, it could be other factors that make them do this. what if it is because they do not see more effort from them to express better advertising theme.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | tomlee0205 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Dinesh4518 | 64 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | aryaman | 58 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | searchinglife06 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | rubelmonir | 16 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...nd less time to weather and local news. thus to attract the viewers they turn over t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
...nd less time to weather and local news. thus to attract the viewers they turn over t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...may sleep earlier at night or they have do not use the strong and professional pro...
^^
Line 9, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...e other factors that make them do this. what if it is because they do not see more e...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.6327345309 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 55.5748502994 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 2260.96107784 47% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 216.0 441.139720559 49% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88425925926 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.56307096286 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49690738069 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 204.123752495 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560185185185 0.468620217663 120% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 705.55239521 45% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.3332455678 57.8364921388 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.222222222 119.503703932 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.324526521 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.70786347227 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193032407467 0.218282227539 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814470138343 0.0743258471296 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931831172613 0.0701772020484 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126032319248 0.128457276422 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939711646634 0.0628817314937 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.3799401198 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.3550499002 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 98.500998004 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.