Vitamin A deficiency

Essay topics:

Vitamin A deficiency

The following argument is flawed for numerous reasons. Primarily, the argument is based on the unwarranted assumption that the solution to deficiency in vitamin A among the people of Tagus is to engineer a new breed of millet that is very expensive but high in vitamin A,rendering its main conclusion, that Tagus is an impoverished nation, invalid.

The argument fails to provide any justification,on how their government would fund this new breed of millet despite their poor economic situation.For one, the farmers need to be paid in order to embrace the farming of this new variety of millet. Had the argument provided information regarding how the government intends to solve their economic situation that can enable them fund for this new breed of millet adequately without it worsen the already poor economic situation.

The argument also leaves many other unanswered questions, if the soil in Tagus is fertile for this new breed of millet to aid its rapid germination so as to combat the deficiency of vitamin A that the people of Tagus are struggling with.

Finally, the argument claims without warrant that this new breed of millet is the only way to deal with the deficiency of vitamin A among the people since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, yet has not been able to solve the deficiency of vitamin A, the argument is still lacking because it has failed to consider other foods that are rich in vitamin A that would eliminate the deficiency of vitamin A, that is equally cheap and would not worsen their already impoverished situation.

Because the argument makes several unwarranted assumptions, it fails to make a convincing case that promoting this new type of millet would eventually eliminate the deficiency of vitamin A among the people of Tagus.

Votes
Average: 5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-20 Dinesh4518 63 view
2023-08-11 Nowshin Tabassum 69 view
2023-07-21 Gnyana 68 view
2023-07-20 Prasad002 59 view
2023-07-08 tanvik21 74 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , rendering
... is very expensive but high in vitamin A,rendering its main conclusion, that Tagus is an i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , on
...ument fails to provide any justification,on how their government would fund this ne...
^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...t despite their poor economic situation.For one, the farmers need to be paid in ord...
^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... of millet to aid its rapid germination so as to combat the deficiency of vitamin A that...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, regarding, so, still, as to, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 11.1786427146 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 2260.96107784 66% => OK
No of words: 297.0 441.139720559 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01346801347 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77889784581 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 204.123752495 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457912457912 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 705.55239521 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 19.7664670659 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 22.8473053892 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 119.343954987 57.8364921388 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 212.714285714 119.503703932 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.4285714286 23.324526521 182% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.70786347227 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292815861935 0.218282227539 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157795022291 0.0743258471296 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154564137662 0.0701772020484 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214638357434 0.128457276422 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137647372252 0.0628817314937 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.4 14.3799401198 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.85 48.3550499002 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.1628742515 181% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 12.197005988 162% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.67 12.5979740519 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 98.500998004 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 12.3882235529 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 11.1389221557 169% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 15
No. of Words: 300 350
No. of Characters: 1453 1500
No. of Different Words: 133 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.162 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.843 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.662 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 104 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 82 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 42.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 21.892 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.549 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.852 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.29 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5