‘Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.’
The argument states that the presence of "Palean" baskets in Lithos indicates that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean. This assertion is based on a few supporting claims which need to substantiated to stregthen this argument. For this purpose, further information is required to test the veracity of these claims.
Firstly, it is claimed that the Brim River separating Palea and Lithos is unpassable. More information is surely required to give weight to this claim. Evidence is required on the perenniality of the river, whether it flowed deep and broad all throughout the year. In case it did not the argument will be significantly weakened as it could explain how the baskets moved from Palea to Lithos. Evidence on other possible ways of crossing the river is also required. There was probably a bridge to cross the river which has since been destroyed. Similarly, there might have been Palean boats to commute to and from across the river but they have been destroyed since then. Evidence is required on whether the villagers of Lithos had any boats which they used to cross the river and reach Palea. It can be true that the villagers of Lithos, rather than Palea, were equipped with modes of transport and these modes were used to visit Palea and bring the baskets to Lithos. In case there is strong evidence suggesting such scenarios the argument will be significantly weakened.
Secondly, evidence is required on the possible transfer of information regarding basket weaving from Palea to Lithos. It is possible that a few villagers were able to migrate to Lithos in search of work or food and also took with them the art of basket weaving which was distinctly Palean. There might also be other way of passing over this skill through communication via scrolls or letters. Even if there was no way for villagers of Palea and Lithos to go to each other's village, there might have been another village accessible by both Paleans and Lithosians which could have been a meeting point for exchange of ideas. Alternatively, the Palean baskets found in Lithos might have originally come from Palea itself but in a roundabout manner travelling through various villages. Hence, information regarding accessability of Palea from other villages is required. Evidence showing the various villages with which Paleans and Lithosians were in contact is required in order to arrive at a possible network throught which the Palean baskets ended up in Lithos. In case there is no such network, the argument will be strengthened in its claim that the baskets found in Lithos are, in fact, not uniquely Palean.
In order to prove the veracity of the argument presented, additional information regarding the topography of the region, the internal network of villages, possible migration, and other modes on transfer of information is required. Only then will the argument be effective in its claim that the baskets found in Lithos are not uniquely Palean.
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor 75
- The following appeared in the summary of a study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia."Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates, f 54
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Requiring university students to take a variety of courses outside their major fields of study is the best way to ensure that students become truly educated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: This assertion is based on a few supporting claims which need to substantiated to stregthen this argument.
Error: stregthen Suggestion: strengthen
Sentence: Firstly, it is claimed that the Brim River separating Palea and Lithos is unpassable.
Error: unpassable Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Evidence is required on the perenniality of the river, whether it flowed deep and broad all throughout the year.
Error: perenniality Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Alternatively, the Palean baskets found in Lithos might have originally come from Palea itself but in a roundabout manner travelling through various villages.
Error: travelling Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Hence, information regarding accessability of Palea from other villages is required.
Error: accessability Suggestion: accessibility
Sentence: Evidence showing the various villages with which Paleans and Lithosians were in contact is required in order to arrive at a possible network throught which the Palean baskets ended up in Lithos.
Error: throught Suggestion: No alternate word
----------------
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
---------------
Let's analyze the structure of the statement and argue accordingly:
condition 1:
Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea.
we may argue:
the sample is not big enough. only one "Palean" basket.
condition 2:
The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. //your argument 1
conclusion:
Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.//your argument 2
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 491 350
No. of Characters: 2427 1500
No. of Different Words: 197 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.707 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.943 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.591 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 172 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 133 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 95 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.348 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.117 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.522 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.337 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.471 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.096 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 723, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a roundabout manner" with adverb for "roundabout"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e originally come from Palea itself but in a roundabout manner travelling through various villages. He...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.6327345309 183% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 55.5748502994 144% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 16.3942115768 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2490.0 2260.96107784 110% => OK
No of words: 491.0 441.139720559 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07128309572 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72273471565 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 204.123752495 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.423625254582 0.468620217663 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 777.6 705.55239521 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8598176332 57.8364921388 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.260869565 119.503703932 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.347826087 23.324526521 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13043478261 5.70786347227 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.67664670659 214% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217944393844 0.218282227539 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660028990481 0.0743258471296 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659678141887 0.0701772020484 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131583905768 0.128457276422 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498305228688 0.0628817314937 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.3799401198 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 98.500998004 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.