According to the article, the woven baskets found in the immediate vicinity were thought to have only been made by the Palean people. However, the another Palean basket was found in an ancient village across the Brim River, which is very deep and broad. Since archaelogist could not find a boat, they have concluded that the baskets were not unique to the Palean people.
However, this statement could be further weakened by the fact that rivers do not stay consistent over time. It is likely that while the Palean people were still alive the river could have been skinner and shallower. Furthermore, the river could have periods where it would have dried up or frozen. Thus, the Palen people could still cross the river without having to create boats.
Additionally, the paragraph states that "a Palean basket" was found in Lithos. It could be likely that the basket could have floated to the other side of the river in a storm or other natural event and then been found by someone from Lithos. Finding one basket is not sufficient evidence to refute the claim that the basket is unqiue to the Palen people. Thus, the basket design could still solely be Palean.
The arguement could be strengthened if the Palean and Lithos people were never in contact with each other and if more baskets were found in Lithos. By finding baskets with the same design in more than one location would put some doubt into the true origins of the basket.
In conclusion, the current size of the river and the lack of boats is not sufficient to conclude that the baskets are not solely Palean. In ancient times the river's size could be different making it possible for individuals in the two villages to communicate without having boats. The argument could be valid if the there were more baskets found in Lithos and the two villages were isolated from each other.
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 77
- 1.Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, 63
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: Since archaelogist could not find a boat, they have concluded that the baskets were not unique to the Palean people.
Error: archaelogist Suggestion: archeologist
Sentence: Finding one basket is not sufficient evidence to refute the claim that the basket is unqiue to the Palen people.
Error: unqiue Suggestion: unique
Sentence: The arguement could be strengthened if the Palean and Lithos people were never in contact with each other and if more baskets were found in Lithos.
Error: arguement Suggestion: argument
----------------
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
Also need to argue:
and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found.
-----------------
flaws:
No. of Words: 322 350 //more content wanted.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 322 350
No. of Characters: 1492 1500
No. of Different Words: 146 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.236 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.634 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.144 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 99 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 56 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.125 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.611 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.397 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.624 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.106 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...et design could still solely be Palean. The arguement could be strengthened if t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bt into the true origins of the basket. In conclusion, the current size of the r...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, still, then, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 2260.96107784 68% => OK
No of words: 322.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79813664596 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25034450337 2.78398813304 81% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 204.123752495 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459627329193 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 705.55239521 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3146452247 57.8364921388 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.5625 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 23.324526521 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 5.70786347227 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290623894411 0.218282227539 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119461634222 0.0743258471296 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110759032693 0.0701772020484 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18952913642 0.128457276422 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117169389997 0.0628817314937 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.3799401198 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.5979740519 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 98.500998004 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.