Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Regarding the students may waste a large amount of time working in a field that they are unlikely to succeed. The author argues that Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing these kind of fields of study. Though it sounds to benefit for students, a closer analysis will find some problems.
Some people may say this idea is well because the students will devote more energy on the field which they are more likely to succeed. However, I really doubt whether these Educational institutions can know every students' characteristics and their abilities. Thus, what are standards could they use to judge a certain students whether he will adopt to a field or not? Possibly, according to the student's performance and scores, they will have a overall judgement, but it does not mean they can know potential abilities of the student. In these point, it's extremely possible that educational institutions will mislead the student. It's not difficult for us to imagine if Einstein did not learn in the field of science according to his teacher who stability think Einstein was too foolish to learn this kind of profound knowledge, he would not succeed.
Others may also opposite my view using a reason that it's bad for the cultivation of Self confident regarding the students who pursing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed are surrounded lots of excellent person. However, I argue that there is subtly difference among people, it's not ration to say some people are good at some field while other are poor in this. For everyone, nearly all the abilities re cultivated after birth. For example, in some technique field, the more amount of things you do, you will be more familiar to the work. Striving for a work without thinking a lot whether you can succeed, you will attain endless confident will you succeed.
Besides, i think not everyone pursing a field wanting to succeed, maybe the major reason is working in the field will offer them much more money than other work or they are really like the work ,they just feel happy and satisfy when they do the things.
In sum, I think it's not ration for educational institutions to do this kind of things, but only they don not have enough abilities, but also have not obligation to do it. Instead, they should improving their teaching abilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-09-07 | neateditor | 56 | view |
| 2013-08-22 | dhanu | 50 | view |
| 2013-08-13 | soran942 | 60 | view |
| 2013-08-03 | sh_shashi1 | 70 | view |
| 2013-07-23 | maryam2900 | 58 | view |
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children's schools. 59
- The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company."When XYZ lays off employees, it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating résumés and developing interviewing skills, if they so desire. Laid-off employees have benefited gr 80
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive. 37
- argument:The following appeared as a letter to the editor from the owner of a skate shop in Central Plaza. "Two years ago the city voted to prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. They claimed thatskateboard users were responsible for the litter and vand 56
- argument:The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Man 57
Sentence: Some people may say this idea is well because the students will devote more energy on the field which they are more likely to succeed.
Description: The fragment is well because is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace well with adjective
Sentence: It's not difficult for us to imagine if Einstein did not learn in the field of science according to his teacher who stability think Einstein was too foolish to learn this kind of profound knowledge, he would not succeed.
Description: A WH-pronoun, nominative is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to who and stability
Sentence: Others may also opposite my view using a reason that it's bad for the ultivation of Self confident regarding the students who pursing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed are surrounded lots of excellent person.
Description: A WH-pronoun, nominative is not usually followed by a verb, present participle or gerund
Suggestion: Refer to who and pursing
Sentence: Besides, i think not everyone pursing a field wanting to succeed, maybe the major reason is working in the field will offer them much more money than other work or they are really like the work ,they just feel happy and satisfy when they do the things.
Description: The fragment are really like is rare
Sentence: Instead, they should improving their teaching abilities.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, present participle or gerund
Suggestion: Refer to should and improving
Sentence: Besides, i think not everyone pursing a field wanting to succeed, maybe the major reason is working in the field will offer them much more money than other work or they are really like the work ,they just feel happy and satisfy when they do the things.
Error: wanting Suggestion: wants
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 399 350
No. of Characters: 1905 1500
No. of Different Words: 195 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.469 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.774 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.515 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 129 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 97 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.471 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.573 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.706 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.318 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.539 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.123 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5