Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In de

Who has not seen politicians fighting each other? Think about it and it is probable that you have seen as politicians of your own country as foreign politicians dealing with personal disputes between them, which could not have reached a good solution or simply ended nowhere. Therefore, politicians should come to an agreement instead looking for personal or party ideals.

Many good bills stay "behind scenes" waiting to be supported by a majority of congressmen in order to be applied. Due to this delay, many benefits for the population are sadly lost. For example, in Peru, many congressmen debated a law related to increase the profits to medical services for the people. A necessary policy for my country. This took several months to every politician gets consensus and this, consequently, led medical doctors to be on strike. This action prejudiced the population the same quantity of time that the bill was delayed to be approved. In addition, this problem is not particular to my country, United of States could face possible economical problems because its politicians do not come to a common ground about the country budget. Thus, political disagreements led bills to be delayed which can harm not only few people but the entire country.

At present political conflicts between countries have born in order to satisfy particular interests which lead to no consensus between parties. These conflicts could end in wars, which could bring a high death toll. For instance, the conflicts in the Middle East have been there a long time for reasons which involve the control of some zones. Many intents of get an agreement between parts have taken part of the history of the conflict for example, between Israel and Palestina, but this only brought more casualties. Similar to this example, many countries have asked the help of The Haya Court in order to resolve conflicts for sea delimitation as for instance, between Peru and Chile. Both parties have had meetings to arrive in a consensus but there was no agreement because of Chilean interests. No one knows the possible response of Chile but its president mentioned that Chile will make to respect its territory with the force independently of the decision of the Court. If politicians between different parties pursue a common ground, it could avoid many people lose their life.

It is true that many laws have been polished before they were approved for a majority of congressmen due to different thoughts between parties. If all the congressmen had come in agreement with the bill as soon as it was proposed, had it been really a good law if this had approved at first instance? If it was polished before, it is probable that the answer was No. Thus, because of politicians do not always think in the same way, this situation has permitted that bills have been enhanced before it was applied beneficiating the population. For example, a bill which regulated recently the private pension fund of workers in Peru. At first instance, the party of the government had made a regulation of this fund which prejudice in certain form the workers. The opposition noticed that and negated to approved this bill unless this be checked before. The result was a stronger law which got rid of excesive costs of the entities in charge and did not threaten the stability of the worker's funds.

In conclusion, if political forces do not arrive in an agreement, many beneficial bills could stay in written words and not to be applied and many army conflicts could be developed, which may lead people to worse situations than they are now.