Science is meaningless without religion.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
Science and religion are intrinsically connected to each other not externally. But people of world are pompous, so they will not see link between two. But some scientist and inventors who were autodidact and having profound intellectual have established connection between two. So I endorse statement and I will justify my reasoning by considering three examples which will explicitly declaim my endorsement towards statement.
Science is meaningless without religion. Some people have promulgated this statement. for instance, take example of Albert Einstein, who is well known physicist in world and counted into category of people with high I.Q ever born in world. He thrived physics with his breakthrough theories which superseded Newton theories. He gave one quote that science is meaningless without religion. He gave explanation for his quote that religion is basal for foundation of science. If that basal will be flabby and swaying then science will have consequence accordingly.
Some explanations even science is failed to provide. For instance, take example of one sky diver whose name was Henry. what happened to him was inexplicable for science. Once he jumped from high altitude around 15000 feet from ground. During time period he was falling with high speed towards ground, he tried to open parachute but parachute failed and he was impending ground with high speed. He thought that he will die. Eventually he hit ground with speed around 800 km/hr and he survived. He was curious to know how he survived with debacle damage. He contacted some scientist for exegesis for his survival but according to science he would have died but indeed he did not. Here science failed but religious explanation was sufficient to provide explanation for wreak. so this show that Science is meaningless without religion.
Whatever happens in nature, science is incapable to explain it. For more elaboration take example of Why earth is rounded not any other shape or activities happening in sun. How sun is producing that much energy. Science tried but did not give satisfactory reason for it. But in religious books they provide reason for formation of sun and source of it. Here in this context also Science is meaningless without religion.
Ultimately, if science wants to cover every field with his explanation then it is not possible because sometimes consequence will create in which science will be inexplicable but religion will be capable of giving explanation. so both are connected to each other. No one can survive aloof. I justified that example of Henry support statement and Einstein who gave explanation for connection between two. So Science is meaningless without religion.
- The regional brand manager sent the following memo to the national brand manager for Sun-Beem Facial Cleanser.“We need to institute a huge publicity campaign for the launch of Sun-Beem’s improved formula. Without an enormous media blitz, including televis 70
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 56
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at 68
- Science is meaningless without religion.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consid 80
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 75
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.931 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 29 15
No. of Words: 433 350
No. of Characters: 2216 1500
No. of Different Words: 206 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.562 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.118 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.76 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 167 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 139 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 86 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.931 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.461 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.483 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.304 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.475 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.17 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5