Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents However my recent interviews with childr

Essay topics:

"Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with children living in the group of islands that includes Tertia show that these children spend much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. This research of mine proves that Dr. Field's conclusion about Tertian village culture is invalid and thus that the observation-centered approach to studying cultures is invalid as well. The interview-centered method that my team of graduate students is currently using in Tertia will establish a much more accurate understanding of child-rearing traditions there and in other island cultures."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

This argument is about the survey conducted by Dr. Field twenty years ago and Dr. Karp recently on the children of Tertia. According to Dr. Karp, Dr. Field observation that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents is not convincing. Furthermore, Dr. Karp and his team of graduate student who conducted survey in Tertia found that children spend much more time talking about their biological parents. Hence, Dr.Karp is suggesting that the interview-centered approach is better than observation-centered approach.However, in order to fully critique this argument, we need to have a significant amount of additional details.

The first piece of evidence is that Dr. Field observation was done twenty years ago as compared to Dr. Karp observation. Twenty years is a very long time. So many changes can happen during this twenty years. When Dr. Field surveyed, it may be possible that during that time the entire village were to be counted as a family. Now there might be the change in the living in the village of Tertia. Children are mostly living with their parents and are no longer in contact with other residents of the village so often as they used to be twenty years ago.

Another piece of evidence that might help us judge is that Dr. Karp has not provided the details of interview questions. It might be possible that he and his team of graduate students were more inclined towards asking questions about their biological parents. They might not have asked the children about citizens of the village or there were very few questions on other individuals as compared to their parents.

One problem with this argument is that the number of survey conducted. He has not provided the details of the number of the children being surveyed. If the number of children surveyed is less, then his study and observation is not vaild in critisizing Dr. Field's observation. Also, there is no evidence of which part of the village was surveyed. Did it included the whole village or only some part ? Clearly, we need to take these questions into account before concluding the claims.

The author has not offered convincing evidence to support his views. He should have strengthened his argumentby providing concrete details on why Dr. Field observation is invalid. To conclude whether Dr. Karp is correct, different questions relating the relevant evidence is required. The author has to work towards making his assumption logically more correct.

Votes
Average: 6.9 (14 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-27 jha 69 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user rezacol :

Comments

Argument 1 -- OK

Argument 2 -- OK

Argument 3 -- Not really. You can argue: the exact locations where Dr. Karp’s interviews took place. --'children living in the group of islands that includes Tertia'; or: how to prove 'conclusion that interview-centered methods are inherently more valid than observational-centered approaches'?

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 415 350
No. of Characters: 2040 1500
No. of Different Words: 184 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.513 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.916 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.662 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 149 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 112 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 77 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.043 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.862 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.348 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.314 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.528 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.151 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5