The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Democracy is the envy to every nation to ensure fair and justice for all people within that country. So does that mean the well-being of a society - the satisfactory state of people within this society, which involves being happy, safe, healthy and having enough money - is enhanced when many of its people question authority? In my opinion, it is a big yes for most of the cases, but a small no in some exceptions.
When opinion of people within a society is listened and addressed properly, public's faith to government, which is extremely essential for a government to perform their function effectively, will surely increases. Let say, if the government want to increase tax in some luxury items, it first needs the corporation from its people, which only achieved when people believe that what government is doing good for their benefits, for example authority would have more fund for bare necessities subsidy scheme or purpose of balancing add stabilizing the economy.
In the democracy society in which people are able to speak out their questions to authority without being afraid of retribution, impurity as well as the governmental vices such as corruption, misuse of power or policies that go against majority of residents is less likely to happen because bad guys are afraid of public voice. For instance, whenever a vice happen, there would be many people who question authority and under public pressure, the authority would have no choice but address the problem in a reasonable manner.
However, when the people rise the question centering sensitive issue such as religions, racist, etc. in inappropriate time or the authority lacks ability to handle many questions properly, such questions with unsatisfied answers can lead national well-being to worse not better - It may promote protests, demonstrations, nation division which in turn retrains authority to perform their role effectively. For example, new government of Pakistan have had extremely difficulties during implementing any of policies to tackle long-standing problem of this nation because there is always questioning and opposition from different groups who are unwilling to compromise.
In conclusion, In general well-being of a society can be enhanced when many of its people question authority because this practice helps to build public's faith to government and limit impurity and social vices. However, it depends on authority ability to handle the question and the type of questions in a particular time, the well-being of a society may be worsen when many of its people question authority.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-10-28 | nilka61 | 57 | view |
2013-07-17 | Ly Phuong Thao | 55 | view |
2013-07-06 | murillo.lf | 40 | view |
2013-02-06 | utkarshece | 60 | view |
2013-01-15 | nargess1981 | 45 | view |
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss the e 90
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 90
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 65
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 68
- The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
Sentence: Let say, if the government want to increase tax in some luxury items, it first needs the corporation from its people, which only achieved when people believe that what government is doing good for their benefits, for example authority would have more fund for bare necessities subsidy scheme or purpose of balancing add stabilizing the economy.
Description: The fragment government want to is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace want with verb, past tense
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 37.364 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 411 350
No. of Characters: 2119 1500
No. of Different Words: 208 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.503 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.156 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.773 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 169 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 127 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 92 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 60 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 37.364 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.984 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.818 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.42 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.705 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.094 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5