10) Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posi

This world is commonplace for all living beings. The environment is equally important for all animals. In this technologically advanced 21st century world, a natural habitat of many living creatures is destroying day by day in the name of production and capitalization. Every nation should be aware of preserving wilderness area in their natural state by employing tight laws and regulations, neither they will face many negative consequences in near future. The possible negative consequences will b discussed in the flow of this essay.

The Earth is a home for all living animals and plants. They all have equal rights on this earth to survive and expand their life freely. As human beings are an erudite and advanced creature, we have also the responsibility to ensure the right of animals. We have to know and let it know to all people that we all living creatures are here in this earth with mutual help. We all are equally important to each other for existence. So, the government of any nations should make laws and regularities to protect the wilderness area to ensure the living right of all creatures.

The wilderness areas preservation also help to balance the ecosystem of the earth. The good and maintaining ecosystem is beneficial to all. For example, if we destroy the forest, many wildlife will be endangered as well as the sources of the water will also be diminished. Not only this the climatic condition of the region will also greatly influenced. The availability of the medicinal herb also will be less encountered.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun wildlife seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much wildlife', 'a good deal of wildlife'.
Suggestion: much wildlife; a good deal of wildlife
... For example, if we destroy the forest, many wildlife will be endangered as well as the sourc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, for example, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 2235.4752809 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 258.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00387596899 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91371054707 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 215.323595506 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527131782946 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 704.065955056 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1462761552 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6875 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.125 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6875 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170236066863 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615681481988 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592011438435 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121195140189 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354681970382 0.0667264976115 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.