143. No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field. 建议
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The speaker asserts that no field of study can significantly develop unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field. I agree with this idea and I would like to add that there are two reasons to explain the speaker’s view. One is that scientific research is interrelated, and another is that incorporation promotes enhance research efficiency. However, collaboration with other fields does not necessarily bring advantages if researchers disobey some principles.
Today’s increasing academic exchanges and the gradually perfect open-access academic platforms bring an unprecedented prosperity in inter-disciplinary research. Although some people contend that in the past when academic communications were not that frequent, scholars have also made cutting-edge discoveries, today loner researchers hardly make significant scientific breakthroughs. First reason is that the world around us, no matter the material one or the spiritual one is an interrelated and interdependent organic ensemble. Thus, studies into these two worlds closely connect with each other, whatever natural science or social science. Scholars who are good at using the connections with other disciplines make important achievements. Although biology, economy and urban planning seemingly are three irrelevant subjects, they are both studying into group behaviors, that of animals and that of people. By referring to ant colony effect, economists designed an agent-based model to simulate customers’ shopping behaviors while urban planners contrived a cellular automata model to predict residential mobility. These two models in turn refined the ant colony theory. The collaboration between these three disciplines clearly illustrates how the intrinsic bond between different studying fields contributes to scientific advancements.
The second reason, why inter-disciplinary research is more likely to make accomplishments than single-disciplinary research, lies in the optimized research methodologies and techniques. Computer science can boost research of all fields because it facilitates the process of collecting and analyzing data and enhances researchers’ ability of calculating. In order to obtain residents’ mobility data, the traditional field survey needs at least three months while the advanced only survey requires only one week. Furthermore, machine learning and artificial intelligence which are apt at calculation can liberate researchers from onerous data processing works. Consequently, researchers can save more times and energies to deal the key research problems.
That being said, incorporating other fields of study does not bring only positive effects. Scholars that fail to deal with the relationship with other fields carry the risk of putting all efforts in vain. Researchers should avoid several traps such as the loss of conviction, the eager to encompass all and the disobeying research interests. Before working with other fields, researchers should seriously choose working partners based on the common research interests. During the collaboration, scholars must always keep their research conviction in mind and not be guided by scholars from other fields. After the collaboration, scholars should return to their research topic, carefully comb their thoughts, resume collaboration experiences and make contributions. All in all, although incorporating other studying fields is attempting, it should always be considered as a means to facilitate research but not become itself the focus of attention.
In conclusion, I agree with the speaker’s argument for two reasons that no one research field exists alone, and the incorporation of other disciplines improve research efficiency. However, researchers should always focus on their own research interest and not let themselves be guided by studies from other fields.
- 48. Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 建议Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explai 66
- It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are generated and preserved 66
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers. Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- 94. The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting you 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...if researchers disobey some principles. Today's increasing academic exchang...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 764, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gies to deal the key research problems. That being said, incorporating other fie...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 413, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to work'.
Suggestion: to work
...ds, researchers should seriously choose working partners based on the common research i...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 555, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s keep their research conviction in mind and not be guided by scholars from other...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, thus, while, at least, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3347.0 2235.4752809 150% => OK
No of words: 553.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05244122966 5.05705443957 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84932490483 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34458423442 2.79657885939 120% => OK
Unique words: 311.0 215.323595506 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562386980108 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 1009.8 704.065955056 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8587730137 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.962962963 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4814814815 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25925925926 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182343288947 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602796560568 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08039741524 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13145632695 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837210832338 0.0667264976115 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 48.8420337079 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 12.1743820225 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.81 12.1639044944 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 173.0 100.480337079 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.